Cited by 780RNA Research and SplicingRNA regulation and diseaseCancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Alternative Splicing Regulatory Networks: Functions, Mechanisms, and Evolution

Open access
Ule, Jernej, Blencowe, Benjamin J.·2019·Molecular Cell

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing-based methods and their applications in the study of transcriptomes have revolutionized our understanding of alternative splicing. Networks of functionally coordinated and biologically important alternative splicing events continue to be discovered in an ever-increasing diversity of cell types in the context of physiologically normal and disease states. These studies have been complemented by efforts directed at defining sequence codes governing splicing and their cognate trans-acting factors, which have illuminated important combinatorial principles of regulation. Additional studies have revealed critical roles of position-dependent, multivalent protein-RNA interactions that direct splicing outcomes. Investigations of evolutionary changes in RNA binding proteins, splice variants, and associated cis elements have further shed light on the emergence, mechanisms, and functions of splicing networks. Progress in these areas has emphasized the need for a coordinated, community-based effort to systematically address the functions of individual splice variants associated with normal and disease biology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.017

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar position-dependent RNA regulatory maps have been reported for other splicing regulators, which function in a cell type- or condition-specific manner.

    “Similar position-dependent RNA regulatory maps have been reported for other splicing regulators, which function in a cell type- or condition-specific manner (Ule and Blencowe 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ule, J., & Blencowe, B. J.
Affiliations
  • The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Ule, Jernej
  • Blencowe, Benjamin J.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
329-345
ISSN
1097-2765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980949872
Cited by
780
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 118 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Simons Foundation
  • Canada First Research Excellence Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Keywords
alternative splicing, splicing regulatory network, RNA-binding proteins, trans-acting splicing factors, RNA-protein interactions, cis-regulatory elements, splice variants, transcriptome, disease biology
MeSH terms
Humans, RNA-Binding Proteins, Alternative Splicing, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review