Cited by 73Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing

Timed Synaptic Inhibition Shapes NMDA Spikes, Influencing Local Dendritic Processing and Global I/O Properties of Cortical Neurons

Open access
Doron, Michael, Chindemi, Giuseppe, Muller, Eilif, Markram, Henry, Segev, Idan·2017·Cell Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The NMDA spike is a long-lasting nonlinear phenomenon initiated locally in the dendritic branches of a variety of cortical neurons. It plays a key role in synaptic plasticity and in single-neuron computations. Combining dynamic system theory and computational approaches, we now explore how the timing of synaptic inhibition affects the NMDA spike and its associated membrane current. When impinging on its early phase, individual inhibitory synapses strongly, but transiently, dampen the NMDA spike; later inhibition prematurely terminates it. A single inhibitory synapse reduces the NMDA-mediated Ca 2+ current, a key player in plasticity, by up to 45%. NMDA spikes in distal dendritic branches/spines are longer-lasting and more resilient to inhibition, enhancing synaptic plasticity at these branches. We conclude that NMDA spikes are highly sensitive to dendritic inhibition; sparse weak inhibition can finely tune synaptic plasticity both locally at the dendritic branch level and globally at the level of the neuron's output.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.035

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The NMDA-current has slow dynamics, promoting integration over a time window of tens of milliseconds.

    “Moreover, the NMDA-current has slow dynamics, promoting integration over a time window of tens of milliseconds (Major, Larkum, and Schiller 2013; Doron et al. 2017).”

    From Single cortical neurons as deep artificial neural networks (2021) · cites this paper as Doron et al. 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Carnevale, N.T., and Hines, M.L. (2006). The NEURON Book (Cambridge University Press). Cell Reports 21, 1550-1561, November 7, 2017 1559
  2. Cuntz, H., Remme, M.W.H., and Torben-Nielsen, B. (2014). The Computing Dendrite (Springer).
  3. Du, K., Wu, Y.-W., Lindroos, R., Liu, Y., Ro ´zsa, B., Katona, G., Ding, J.B., and Kotaleski, J.H. (2017). Cell-type-specific inhibition of the dendritic plateau potential in striatal spiny projection neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 114, E7612-7621.
  4. Graupner, M., and Brunel, N. (2012). Calcium-based plasticity model explains sensitivity of synaptic changes to spike pattern, rate, and dendritic location. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3991-3996.
  5. Jack, J.J.B., Noble, D., and Tsien, R.W. (1975). Electric Current Flow in Excit- able Cells (Clarendon Press).
  6. Magee, J.C. (2016). Dendritic voltage-gated ion channels. In Dendrites, G. Stuart, N. Spruston, and M. Ha ¨usser, eds. (Oxford University Press), pp. 259-284.
  7. Shouval, H.Z., Bear, M.F., and Cooper, L.N. (2002). A unified model of NMDA receptor-dependent bidirectional synaptic plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10831-10836.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doron, M., Chindemi, G., Muller, E., Markram, H., & Segev, I.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Doron, Michael
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1550-1561
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767528263
Cited by
73
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  • EPFL-Hebrew University Collaborative Grant
  • EPFL
  • ETH
  • European Union Seventh Framework Program (604102)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Keywords
synaptic inhibition, dendritic inhibition, dendritic processing, cortical neurons, synaptic plasticity, calcium current, inhibitory synapses, dendritic spines, dynamical systems theory, single-neuron computation
MeSH terms
Calcium, Dendrites, Models, Biological, Neurons, Receptors, GABA-A, Synapses, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, N-Methylaspartate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review