Cited by 123RNA Research and SplicingProtein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Aryl Sulfonamides Degrade RBM39 and RBM23 by Recruitment to CRL4-DCAF15

Open access
Ting, Tabitha C., Goralski, Maria, Klein, Katherine, Wang, Baiyun, Kim, Jiwoong, Xie, Yang, Nijhawan, Deepak·2019·Cell Reports

Abstract

Indisulam and related sulfonamides recruit the splicing factor RBM39 to the CRL4-DCAF15 E3 ubiquitin ligase, resulting in RBM39 ubiquitination and degradation. Here, we used a combination of domain mapping and random mutagenesis to identify domains or residues that are necessary for indisulam-dependent RBM39 ubiquitination. DCAF15 mutations at Q232 or D475 prevent RBM39 recruitment by indisulam. RBM39 is recruited to DCAF15 by its RRM2 (RNA recognition motif 2) and is ubiquitinated on its N terminus. RBM23, which is an RBM39 paralog, is also recruited to the CRL4-DCAF15 ligase through its RRM2 domain and undergoes sulfonamide-dependent degradation. Indisulam alters the expression of more than 3,000 genes and causes widespread intron retention and exon skipping. All of these changes can be attributed to RBM39, and none are the consequence of RBM23 degradation. Our findings demonstrate that indisulam selectively degrades RBM23 and RBM39, the latter of which is critically important for splicing and gene expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.079

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same MG mechanism has been revealed for antitumor aryl-sulfonamides, which reprogram DCAF15 to bind and degrade certain RNA-binding proteins.

    “The same MG mechanism has subsequently been revealed for antitumor aryl-sulfonamides, which reprograms another CRL4 substrate receptor, DCAF15, to bind and degrade certain RNA-binding proteins21–26.”
  • Additional MGDs have been reported that induce degradation of proteins devoid of obvious ligand-binding pockets, such as RBM39 or cyclin K.

    “Additional MGDs have been reported, which induce the degradation of proteins devoid of obvious ligand-binding pockets, such as RBM3954−57 or cyclin K (CycK).58−60”
  • Sulfonamides previously in clinical trials use DCAF15 to degrade RBM39 via a molecular glue mechanism.

    “sulfonamides previously in clinical trials81,82 that have since been shown to use DCAF15 to degrade RBM39 (refs25,27,29), also via a molecular glue mechanism”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

  • CR8, originally developed as a CDK inhibitor, acts as a first-in-class molecular glue degrader of cyclin K.

    “Firstly, by mining correlations between drug sensitivity and the gene-expression profiles of E3 ubiquitin ligase components in hundreds of cell lines, it was discovered that CR8, which was originally developed as a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, acts as a first-in-class molecular glue degrader of cyclin K182.”
  • Two additional, entirely distinct classes of small-molecule molecular glue degraders have been discovered.

    “Two additional, entirely distinct classes of small-molecule molecular glue degraders have been discovered.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 123

Authors
Ting, T. C., Goralski, M., Klein, K., Wang, B., Kim, J., Xie, Y., & Nijhawan, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Nijhawan, Deepak
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1499-1510.e6
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987448722
Cited by
123
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • McKnight Foundation
  • National Cancer Institute (R37CA226771, RO1CA217333, RBM23, RBM39 G268V, HCT116)
  • Welch Foundation (I-1879)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
indisulam, arylsulfonamides, RBM39, E3 ubiquitin ligase, protein degradation, ubiquitination, splicing factors, intron retention, exon skipping, aberrant splicing, selective degradation
MeSH terms
RNA Recognition Motif Proteins, Protein Domains, Humans, Lysine, Mutation, Protein Binding, RNA Splicing, Sulfonamides, Mutagenesis, RNA-Binding Proteins, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Cell Line, Tumor, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Receptors, Interleukin-17, Ubiquitination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review