Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex Differences in Gene Expression and Regulatory Networks across 29 Human Tissues

Open access
Lopes-Ramos, Camila M., Chen, Cho-Yi, Kuijjer, Marieke L., Paulson, Joseph N., Sonawane, Abhijeet R., Fagny, Maud, Platig, John, Glass, Kimberly, Quackenbush, John, DeMeo, Dawn L.·2020·Cell Reports

Abstract

Sex differences manifest in many diseases and may drive sex-specific therapeutic responses. To understand the molecular basis of sex differences, we evaluated sex-biased gene regulation by constructing sample-specific gene regulatory networks in 29 human healthy tissues using 8,279 whole-genome expression profiles from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. We find sex-biased regulatory network structures in each tissue. Even though most transcription factors (TFs) are not differentially expressed between males and females, many have sex-biased regulatory targeting patterns. In each tissue, genes that are differentially targeted by TFs between the sexes are enriched for tissue-related functions and diseases. In brain tissue, for example, genes associated with Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease are targeted by different sets of TFs in each sex. Our systems-based analysis identifies a repertoire of TFs that play important roles in sex-specific architecture of gene regulatory networks, and it underlines sex-specific regulatory processes in both health and disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107795

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pan, 2011, Elevated expression of CUEDC2 protein confers endocrine resistance in breast cancer, Nat. Med., 17, 708, 10.1038/nm.2369 · doi:10.1038/nm.2369

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Lopes-Ramos, C. M., Chen, C.-Y., Kuijjer, M. L., Paulson, J. N., Sonawane, A. R., Fagny, M., Platig, J., Glass, K., Quackenbush, J., & DeMeo, D. L.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
107795
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037120109
Cited by
445
References
51
FWCI
16.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (5R01AI099204)
  • National Cancer Institute (1R35CA220523, 1U01CA190234, 5P30CA006516, 1R35CA197449, 5P50CA127003)
  • Universitetet i Oslo
  • Norges Forskningsråd
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K25HL133599, 5R01HL111759, 5P01HL114501, 5P01HL105339, K25HL140186)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex Differences in Gene Expression and Regulatory Networks across 29 Human Tissues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107795
The paper
Lopes-Ramos, C. M., Chen, C.-Y., Kuijjer, M. L., Paulson, J. N., Sonawane, A. R., Fagny, M., Platig, J., Glass, K., Quackenbush, J., & DeMeo, D. L. (2020). Sex Differences in Gene Expression and Regulatory Networks across 29 Human Tissues. Cell Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107795

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.