Cited by 440vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesChemical Synthesis and Analysis

MHCflurry 2.0: Improved Pan-Allele Prediction of MHC Class I-Presented Peptides by Incorporating Antigen Processing

Open access
O’Donnell, Timothy J., Rubinsteyn, Alex, Laserson, Uri·2020·Cell Systems

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Computational prediction of the peptides presented on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I proteins is an important tool for studying T cell immunity. The data available to develop such predictors have expanded with the use of mass spectrometry to identify naturally presented MHC ligands. In addition to elucidating binding motifs, the identified ligands also reflect the antigen processing steps that occur prior to MHC binding. Here, we developed an integrated predictor of MHC class I presentation that combines new models for MHC class I binding and antigen processing. Considering only peptides first predicted by the binding model to bind strongly to MHC, the antigen processing model is trained to discriminate published mass spectrometry-identified MHC class I ligands from unobserved peptides. The integrated model outperformed the two individual components as well as NetMHCpan 4.0 and MixMHCpred 2.0.2 on held-out mass spectrometry experiments. Our predictors are implemented in the open source MHCflurry package, version 2.0 (github.com/openvax/mhcflurry).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cels.2020.06.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Donnell, T. J., Rubinsteyn, A., & Laserson, U.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
O’Donnell, Timothy J.
Venue
Cell Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
42-48.e7
ISSN
2405-4712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3042910002
Cited by
440
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-10-21)
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
MHC class I peptide presentation, antigen processing, MHC binding prediction, T cell immunity, NetMHCpan
MeSH terms
Alleles, Humans, Peptides, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Antigen Presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review