Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nano-silica

Deb, Partha Sarathi, Sarker, Prabir Kumar, Barbhuiya, Salim·2016·Cement and Concrete Composites

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the effects of nano-silica on flowability, strength development, sorptivity and acid resistance properties of fly ash geopolymer mortars cured at 20 °C. The changes in mass, compressive strength and microstructure of the specimens after immersion in acid solutions for different durations were determined. The microstructures were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. It was found that addition of nano-silica in geopolymer mortars based on fly ash alone or fly ash blended with 15% GGBFS or 10% OPC improved the compactness of microstructure by reducing porosity. Thus, the nano-silica reduced sorptivity and increased compressive strength of the mixes. The average mass loss after 90 days of immersion in acid solutions reduced from 6.0% to 1.9% by addition of 2% nano-silica. Similarly, significant reduction in strength loss after immersion in acid solution was observed in the specimens by using nano-silica.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.06.017

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Deb, 2013, Strength and permeation properties of slag blended fly ash based geopolymer concrete, Adv. Mater. Res., 651, 168, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.651.168 · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.651.168
  2. Mehta, 1985, Studies on chemical resistance of low water/cement ratio concrete, Cem. Concr. Res., 15, 969, 10.1016/0008-8846(85)90087-0 · doi:10.1016/0008-8846(85)90087-0
  3. Belkowitz, 2015, The impact of nano silica size and surface area on concrete properties, Mater. J., 112, 419
  4. Lloyd, 2012, Acid resistance of inorganic polymer binders. 1. Corrosion rate, Mater. Struct., 45, 1, 10.1617/s11527-011-9744-7 · doi:10.1617/s11527-011-9744-7
  5. Fattuhi, 1988, The performance of cement paste and concrete subjected to sulphuric acid attack, Cem. Concr. Res., 18, 545, 10.1016/0008-8846(88)90047-6 · doi:10.1016/0008-8846(88)90047-6
  6. Israel, 1997, Acid attack on pore-reduced cements, J. Mater. Sci., 32, 4109, 10.1023/A:1018610109429 · doi:10.1023/a:1018610109429

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Deb, P. S., Sarker, P. K., & Barbhuiya, S.
Venue
Cement and Concrete Composites
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
72
Pages
235-245
ISSN
0958-9465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2464301471
Cited by
256
References
33
FWCI
15.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
State and Commonwealth Governments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.