The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influence of limestone on the hydration of Portland cements
Open accessAbstract
The influence of the presence of limestone on the hydration of Portland cement was investigated. Blending of Portland cement with limestone was found to influence the hydrate assemblage of the hydrated cement. Thermodynamic calculations as well as experimental observations indicated that in the presence of limestone, monocarbonate instead of monosulfate was stable. Thermodynamic modelling showed that the stabilisation of monocarbonate in the presence of limestone indirectly stabilised ettringite leading to a corresponding increase of the total volume of the hydrate phase and a decrease of porosity. The measured difference in porosity between the "limestone-free" cement, which contained less than 0.3% CO2, and a cement containing 4% limestone, however, was much smaller than calculated. Coupling of thermodynamic modelling with a set of kinetic equations which described the dissolution of the clinker, predicted quantitatively the amount of hydrates. The quantities of ettringite, portlandite and amorphous phase as determined by TGA and XRD agreed well with the calculated amounts of these phases after different periods of time. The findings in this paper show that changes in the bulk composition of hydrating cements can be followed by coupled thermodynamic models. Comparison between experimental and modelled data helps to understand in more detail the dominating processes during cement hydration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nagra/PSI Chemical Thermodynamic Data Base 01/01
Hummel, W., Berner, U., Curti, E., Pearson, F. J., & Thoenen, T. (2002) · Radiochimica Acta · doi:10.1524/ract.2002.90.9-11_2002.805 · Cited by 705
Inskeep, W. P., & Bloom, P. R. (1985) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(85)90074-2 · Cited by 172
Cited by
Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015 · Cited by 3,620
Self-citationSupplementary cementitious materials
Lothenbach, B., Scrivener, K., & Hooton, R. D. (2011) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001 · Cited by 3,406
Self-citationLothenbach, B., Kulik, D. A., Matschei, T., Balonis, M., Baquerizo, L., Dilnesa, B., Miron, G. D., & Myers, R. J. (2019) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.018 · Cited by 1,250
Self-citationTechnical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement
Van Deventer, J. S. J., Provis, J. L., & Duxson, P. (2012) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.009 · Cited by 820
Walkley, B., San Nicolas, R., Sani, M.-A., Rees, G. J., Hanna, J. V., van Deventer, J. S. J., & Provis, J. L. (2016) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.010 · Cited by 544
Metadata
- Authors
- Lothenbach, B., Le Saout, G., Gallucci, E., & Scrivener, K.
- Venue
- Cement and Concrete Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 848-860
- ISSN
- 0008-8846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006827153
- Cited by
- 1,699
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 87.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of limestone on the hydration of Portland cements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.002
- The paper
- Lothenbach, B., Le Saout, G., Gallucci, E., & Scrivener, K. (2008). Influence of limestone on the hydration of Portland cements. Cement and Concrete Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.01.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.