Cited by 46Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchMagnesium Oxide Properties and ApplicationsCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Effects of magnesium content and carbonation on the multiscale pore structure of alkali-activated slags

Open access
Wang, Sarah Y., McCaslin, Eric, White, Claire E.·2020·Cement and Concrete Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.105979

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, S. Y., McCaslin, E., & White, C. E.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
White, Claire E.
Venue
Cement and Concrete Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
130
Pages
105979
ISSN
0008-8846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3001240985
Cited by
46
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Cement and Concrete Research (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1553607)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Keywords
alkali-activated slag, blast furnace slag, magnesium content, carbonation resistance, multiscale pore structure, pore size distribution, capillary pores, CO2 emissions, ordinary Portland cement, X-ray microtomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review