The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CFD–DEM simulation of the gas–solid flow in a cyclone separator
Open accessAbstract
Abstract In this work, a numerical study of the gas–solid flow in a gas cyclone is carried out by use of the combined discrete element method (DEM) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model where the motion of discrete particles phase is obtained by DEM which applies Newton’s equations of motion to every individual particle and the flow of continuum fluid by the traditional CFD which solves the Navier–Stokes equations at a computational cell scale. The model successfully captures the key flow features in a gas cyclone, such as the strands flow pattern of particles, and the decrease of pressure drop and tangential velocity after loading solids. The effect of solid loading ratio is studied and analysed in terms of gas and solid flow structures, and the particle–gas, particle–particle and particle–wall interaction forces. It is found that the gas pressure drop increases first and then decreases when solids are loaded. The reaction force of particles on gas flow is mainly in the tangential direction and directs mainly upward in the axial direction. The reaction force in the tangential direction will decelerate gas phase and the upward axial force will prevent gas phase from flowing downward in the near wall region. The intensive particle–wall collision regions mainly locate in the wall opposite to the cyclone inlet and the cone wall. Moreover, as the solid loading ratio increases, number of turns travelled by solids in a cyclone decreases especially in the apex region of the cyclone while the width of solid strands increases, the pressure drop and tangential velocity decrease, the high axial velocity region moves upwards, and the radial flow of gas phase is significantly dampened.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies
Cundall, P. A., & Strack, O. D. L. (1979) · Géotechnique · doi:10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 · Cited by 17,527
Modeling The Gas and Particle Flow Inside Cyclone Separators
CORTES, C., & GIL, A. (2007) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2007.02.001 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Chu, K. W., Wang, B., Xu, D. L., Chen, Y. X., & Yu, A. B.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 834-847
- ISSN
- 0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158425175
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CFD–DEM simulation of the gas–solid flow in a cyclone separator. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ces.2010.11.026
- The paper
- Chu, K. W., Wang, B., Xu, D. L., Chen, Y. X., & Yu, A. B. (2011). CFD–DEM simulation of the gas–solid flow in a cyclone separator. Chemical Engineering Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2010.11.026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.