Cited by 115Celiac Disease Research and ManagementEosinophilic EsophagitisGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Diet Improves Perception of Health and Well-being in Symptomatic, but Not Asymptomatic, Patients With Celiac Disease

Ukkola, Anniina, Mäki, Markku, Kurppa, Kalle, Collin, Pekka, Huhtala, Heini, Kekkonen, Leila, Kaukinen, Katri·2011·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims The benefits of serologic screening and early diagnosis of celiac disease in asymptomatic patients are not known. We investigated the impact of a gluten-free diet on self-perceived health and well-being in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with celiac disease. Methods We performed a prospective study of 698 consecutive adults newly diagnosed with celiac disease because of classic (n = 490) or extraintestinal (n = 62) symptoms or through screening of at-risk groups (n = 146; 23 were asymptomatic and analyzed separately). The survey included questions on health and well-being; quality of life was evaluated by the psychological general well-being (PGWB) questionnaire. Patients were followed for 1 year of treatment; 110 healthy subjects served as controls. Results On a gluten-free diet, self-perceived health improved significantly among patients with classic symptoms and those detected by screening. Patients in all groups were equally concerned about their health before the diagnosis, but anxiety was alleviated by the gluten-free diet. At diagnosis, the quality of life reduced among all 3 groups but improved significantly among patients on the diet. Among the 23 asymptomatic patients, perception of health worsened and concern about health increased while they were on the diet. Conclusions Self-perceived health and well-being were low among patients at the time they were diagnosed with celiac disease. Most patients benefited from a gluten-free diet, so it is…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.10.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For screening-detected persons with minor or no symptoms or those who do not remember their symptoms due to young age at diagnosis, the motivation to adhere to a GFD is based on internalizing the risks or possible consequences to later health and enduring beliefs of being spared negative consequences.

    “For screening-detected persons with minor or no symptoms (144, 145) or those who do not remember their symptoms due to young age at diagnosis, the motivation to adhere to a GFD is based on internalizing the risks / possible consequences to later health (146) and enduring beliefs of being spared negative consequences (146).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ukkola, A., Mäki, M., Kurppa, K., Collin, P., Huhtala, H., Kekkonen, L., & Kaukinen, K.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Tampere (FI)
  • Finnish Coeliac Society (FI)
Corresponding author
Kaukinen, Katri
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
118-123.e1
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167366173
Cited by
115
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
celiac disease, gluten-free diet, health perception, well-being, quality of life, psychological well-being, asymptomatic patients, serological screening, extraintestinal manifestations, anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Celiac Disease, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Case-Control Studies, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review