Cited by 4Hepatitis C virus researchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeDelphi Technique in Research

Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Hepatitis C Virus Treatment Studies

Open access
Evon, Donna M.·2014·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.017

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a need in clinical hepatology studies to capture patient-reported experiences using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to complement traditional clinician-reported adverse events and laboratory markers.

    “There is also a need in clinical hepatology studies to capture patient-reported experiences using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to complement traditional clinician-reported adverse events and laboratory markers [7, 8].”

    From Novel patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used in a pilot and feasibility study of a Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills (CBCS) group intervention for patients with chronic hepatitis C (2018) · cites this paper as [8]

    In “Incorporating Patient-reported Outcomes into HCV Treatment Studies” (page unavailable), the paper says patient-reported outcomes capture experiences not readily captured by clinician reports or objective markers and provide complementary information about treatment benefits and harms. Its recommendation concerns hepatitis C treatment research specifically; it does not establish the need across clinical hepatology studies generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PROMs are used less often in clinical hepatology studies.

    “PROMs are often the best method for evaluating clinical improvements in mental and physical health outcomes in other medical populations but are used less often in clinical hepatology studies [8].”

    From Novel patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used in a pilot and feasibility study of a Cognitive Behavioral Coping Skills (CBCS) group intervention for patients with chronic hepatitis C (2018) · cites this paper as [8]

    In “Incorporating Patient-reported Outcomes into HCV Treatment Studies” (page unavailable), the paper contrasts established use of patient-reported outcomes in oncology with their limited publication and proposed wider use in HCV treatment research. That supports the claim for HCV studies, but the paper does not establish that these measures are used less often across clinical hepatology studies generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evon, D. M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Evon, Donna M.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
12
Issue
8
Pages
1360-1362
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992058806
Cited by
4
References
13
Citations by year
2018: 3 · 2017: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI050410)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK089004)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K24HD069204)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords
patient-reported outcomes, hepatitis C virus, antiviral therapy, health-related quality of life, symptom reporting, treatment side effects, functional status, clinical trial endpoints
MeSH terms
Sofosbuvir, Antiviral Agents, Humans, Interferons, Uridine Monophosphate, Hepatitis C, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review