The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining Disease Severity in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Current and Future Directions
Open accessAbstract
Although most treatment algorithms in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) begin with classifying patients according to disease severity, no formal validated or consensus definitions of mild, moderate, or severe IBD currently exist. There are 3 main domains relevant to the evaluation of disease severity in IBD: impact of the disease on the patient, disease burden, and disease course. These measures are not mutually exclusive and the correlations and interactions between them are not necessarily proportionate. A comprehensive literature search was performed regarding current definitions of disease severity in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and the ability to categorize disease severity in a particular patient. Although numerous assessment tools for symptoms, quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, fatigue, endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging, and histology (in ulcerative colitis) were identified, few have validated thresholds for categorizing disease activity or severity. Moving forward, we propose a preliminary set of criteria that could be used to classify IBD disease severity. These are grouped by the 3 domains of disease severity: impact of the disease on the patient (clinical symptoms, quality of life, fatigue, and disability); measurable inflammatory burden (C-reactive protein, mucosal lesions, upper gastrointestinal involvement, and disease extent), and disease course (including structural damage, history/extension of intestinal resection, perianal disease, number of flares, and extraintestinal manifestations). We further suggest that a disease severity classification should be developed and validated by an international group to develop a pragmatic means of identifying patients with severe disease. This is increasingly important to guide current therapeutic strategies for IBD and to develop treatment algorithms for clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patient-reported outcomes as primary end points in clinical trials of inflammatory bowel disease
Williet, N., Sandborn, W. J., & Peyrin–Biroulet, L. (2014) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.016 · Cited by 260
Patient defined dichotomous end points for remission and clinical improvement in ulcerative colitis
Higgins, P. D. R., Schwartz, M., Mapili, J., Krokos, I., Leung, J., & Zimmermann, E. M. (2005) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2004.056358 · Cited by 244
The Manitoba IBD Index: Evidence for a New and Simple Indicator of IBD Activity
Clara, I., Lix, L. M., Walker, J. R., Graff, L. A., Miller, N., Rogala, L., Rawsthorne, P., & Bernstein, C. N. (2009) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2009.197 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Lamb, C. A., Kennedy, N. A., Raine, T., Hendy, P. A., Smith, P. J., Limdi, J. K., Hayee, B., Lomer, M. C. E., Parkes, G. C., Selinger, C., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484 · Cited by 2,346
Prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Byrne, G., Rosenfeld, G., Leung, Y., Qian, H., Raudzus, J., Nunez, C., & Bressler, B. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1155/2017/6496727 · Cited by 234
Current best practice for disease activity assessment in IBD
Walsh, A. J., Bryant, R. V., & Travis, S. P. L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2016.128 · Cited by 223
Abu-Sbeih, H., Ali, F. S., Alsaadi, D., Jennings, J., Luo, W., Gong, Z., Richards, D. M., Charabaty, A., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/s40425-018-0461-4 · Cited by 215
Big data in IBD: a look into the future
Olivera, P., Danese, S., Jay, N., Natoli, G., & Peyrin-Biroulet, L. (2019) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0102-5 · Cited by 151
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peyrin-Biroulet, L., Panés, J., Sandborn, W. J., Vermeire, S., Danese, S., Feagan, B. G., Colombel, J.-F., Hanauer, S. B., & Rycroft, B.
- Venue
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 348-354.e17
- ISSN
- 1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2251103812
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.