Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Familial Risk and Heritability of Colorectal Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer

Open access
Graff, Rebecca E., Möller, Sören, Passarelli, Michael N., Witte, John S., Skytthe, Axel, Christensen, Kaare, Tan, Qihua, Adami, Hans-Olov, Czene, Kamila, Harris, Jennifer R., Pukkala, Eero, Kaprio, Jaakko, Giovannucci, Edward L., Mucci, Lorelei A., Hjelmborg, Jacob B.·2017·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & Aims We analyzed data from twins to determine how much the familial risk of colorectal cancer can be attributed to genetic factors vs environment. We also examined whether heritability is distinct for colon vs rectal cancer, given evidence of distinct etiologies. Methods Our data set included 39,990 monozygotic and 61,443 same‐sex dizygotic twins from the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer. We compared each cancer’s risk in twins of affected co‐twins relative to the cohort risk (familial risk ratio [FRR]). We then estimated the proportion of variation in risk that could be attributed to genetic factors (heritability). Results From earliest registration in 1943 through 2010, there were 1861 individuals diagnosed with colon cancer and 1268 diagnosed with rectal cancer. Monozygotic twins of affected co‐twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 3.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4–3.8) relative to the cohort risk. Dizygotic twins of affected co‐twins had an FRR for colorectal cancer of 2.2 (95% CI, 1.7–2.7). We estimated that 40% (95% CI, 33%–48%) of the variation in colorectal cancer risk could be attributed to genetic factors; unique environment only accounted for the remaining liability. For colon cancer, the FRR was 3.3 (95% CI, 2.1–4.5) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7–3.5) for dizygotic twins. For rectal cancer, comparable estimates were 3.3 (95% CI, 1.5–5.1) for monozygotic twins and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.2–4.0) for dizygotic twins. Heritability estimates for colon and rectal cancer were 16% (95% CI, 0–46%) and 15% (95% CI, 0–50%), common environment estimates were 15% (95% CI, 0–38%) and 11% (95% CI, 0–38%), and unique environment estimates were 68% (95% CI, 57%–79%) and 75% (95% CI, 61%–88%), respectively. Conclusions Interindividual genetic differences could account for 40% of the variation in susceptibility to colorectal cancer; risk for colon and rectal cancers might have less of a genetic component than risk for colorectal cancer. Siblings, and particularly monozygotic co‐twins, of individuals with colon or rectal cancer should consider personalized screening.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.041

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Authors
Graff, R. E., Möller, S., Passarelli, M. N., Witte, J. S., Skytthe, A., Christensen, K., Tan, Q., Adami, H.-O., Czene, K., Harris, J. R., Pukkala, E., Kaprio, J., Giovannucci, E. L., Mucci, L. A., & Hjelmborg, J. B.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
1256-1264
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2580024686
Cited by
161
References
2
FWCI
5.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Familial Risk and Heritability of Colorectal Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.041
The paper
Graff, R. E., Möller, S., Passarelli, M. N., Witte, J. S., Skytthe, A., Christensen, K., Tan, Q., Adami, H.-O., Czene, K., Harris, J. R., Pukkala, E., Kaprio, J., Giovannucci, E. L., Mucci, L. A., & Hjelmborg, J. B. (2017). Familial Risk and Heritability of Colorectal Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.