Cited by 4,005Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families

Neale, Michael C., Cardon, Lon R.·1992·Springer eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-015-8018-2

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Venue
Springer eBooks
Published
1992
OpenAlex
W1561568624
Cited by
4,005
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 111 · 2017: 110 · 2016: 132 · 2015: 154 · 2014: 191 · 2013: 171 · 2012: 177
FWCI
36.63
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
twin studies, family studies, genetic epidemiology, human diversity, heritability, genetic method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review