Response to Pioglitazone in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis With vs Without Type 2 Diabetes
Abstract
Background & aims Pioglitazone is effective for long-term treatment of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. However, it is not clear how the presence of type 2 diabetes affects the drug's efficacy. We compared metabolic and histologic responses to pioglitazone in patients with NASH and prediabetes vs type 2 diabetes. Methods We performed a prospective study of adults with biopsy-proven NASH (52 with type 2 diabetes and 49 with prediabetes), enrolled from the general population of San Antonio, Texas, from 2008 through 2014. After a run-in period of approximately 4 weeks, when all baseline measurements were made (liver magnetic resonance proton spectroscopy, euglycemic insulin clamp with glucose turnover measurements, dual-energy absorptiometry, and liver biopsy), subjects were randomly assigned to groups given pioglitazone or placebo (45 mg/d) for 18 months; all procedures performed at baseline were then repeated. The primary outcome was a reduction in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score of 2 points or more (for at least 2 components) without worsening of fibrosis (and expressed as difference vs placebo). Secondary outcomes included NASH resolution, individual histologic components, intrahepatic triglyceride content (measured by 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy), and insulin sensitivity (measured by euglycemic insulin clamp). Results The primary outcome was met by 48% of patients with type 2 diabetes vs 46% without diabetes. Resolution of NASH was achieved in 44% of patients with type 2 diabetes vs 26% without diabetes. A significant reduction in fibrosis, from baseline, was observed only in patients with type 2 diabetes (P = .035). Intrahepatic triglyceride content was reduced by 11% ± 2% in patients with diabetes vs a reduction of 9% ± 2% in patients without diabetes (P = .62); the plasma level of alanine aminotransferase was reduced by 50 ± 10 U/L in patients with diabetes vs a reduction of 36 ± 5 U/L in patients without diabetes (P = .22). Pioglitazone was associated with a significantly greater insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue of patients with diabetes vs without diabetes (P < .001), but nonsignificant differences in responses in hepatic (P = .49) and skeletal muscle (P = .32) insulin sensitivity. Conclusions In a prospective study, we found pioglitazone to be effective in patients with and without type 2 diabetes. However, pioglitazone reduced liver fibrosis and increased adipose tissue insulin sensitivity at significantly greater levels in patients with type 2 diabetes than in patients with prediabetes. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms by which pioglitazone reduces liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00994682.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with both MASLD and T2DM exhibit a more severe disease phenotype and pronounced insulin resistance, which may fundamentally alter their response to PUFA interventions.
“Patients with both MASLD and T2DM exhibit a more severe disease phenotype and pronounced insulin resistance, which may fundamentally alter their response to PUFAinterventions.15”
A significant reduction in fibrosis score under Pioglitazone treatment is only seen in type 2 diabetic patients, not in those with prediabetes.
“a significant reduction in fibrosis score under Pioglitazone treatment is only seen in type 2 diabetic patients since Bril et al. showed a significant reduction of fibrosis with 45 mg/day. Pioglitazone treatment was only seen in type 2 diabetic patients, not in those with prediabetes [38].”
From Current treatment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (2022) · cites this paper as [38]
Cites
A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
Belfort, R., Harrison, S. A., Brown, K., Darland, C., Finch, J., Hardies, J., Balas, B., Gastaldelli, A., Tio, F., Pulcini, J., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa060326 · Cited by 1,827 · see citing works
Self-citationPioglitazone after Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
Kernan, W. N., Viscoli, C. M., Furie, K. L., Young, L. H., Inzucchi, S. E., Gorman, M., Guarino, P. D., Lovejoy, A. M., Peduzzi, P. N., Conwit, R., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1506930 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
Cusi, K., Orsak, B., Bril, F., Lomonaco, R., Hecht, J., Ortiz-Lopez, C., Tio, F., Hardies, J., Darland, C., Musi, N., et al. (2016) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-1774 · Cited by 1,024 · see citing works
Self-citationPioglitazone for Diabetes Prevention in Impaired Glucose Tolerance
DeFronzo, R. A., Tripathy, D., Schwenke, D. C., Banerji, M., Bray, G. A., Buchanan, T. A., Clement, S. C., Henry, R. R., Hodis, H. N., Kitabchi, A. E., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1010949 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a call to action
Bril, F., & Cusi, K. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-1787 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Self-citationPrevention of Diabetes With Pioglitazone in ACT NOW
DeFronzo, R. A., Tripathy, D., Schwenke, D. C., Banerji, M., Bray, G. A., Buchanan, T. A., Clement, S. C., Gastaldelli, A., Henry, R. R., Kitabchi, A. E., et al. (2013) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db13-0265 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Duell, P. B., Welty, F. K., Miller, M., Chait, A., Hammond, G., Ahmad, Z., Cohen, D. E., Horton, J. D., Pressman, G. S., Toth, P. P., et al. (2022) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atv.0000000000000153 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
From NASH to diabetes and from diabetes to NASH: Mechanisms and treatment options
Gastaldelli, A., & Cusi, K. (2019) · JHEP Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.07.002 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Self-citationLomonaco, R., Godinez Leiva, E., Bril, F., Shrestha, S., Mansour, L., Budd, J., Portillo Romero, J., Schmidt, S., Chang, K.-L., Samraj, G., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-1997 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent treatment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease
Paternostro, R., & Trauner, M. (2022) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.13531 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Mantovani, A., Byrne, C. D., & Targher, G. (2022) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00261-2 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Gut-pancreas-liver Axis as a target for treatment of NAFLD/NASH
Svegliati-Baroni, G., Patrício, B., Lioci, G., Macedo, M. P., & Gastaldelli, A. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21165820 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Bril, F., Barb, D., Lomonaco, R., Lai, J., & Cusi, K. (2020) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.09.018 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Metabolic syndrome and its association with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
Bril, F., Sanyal, A., & Cusi, K. (2023) · Clinics in Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.cld.2023.01.002 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationThe interplay between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
Finney, A. C., Das, S., Kumar, D., McKinney, M. P., Cai, B., Yurdagul, A., & Rom, O. (2023) · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1116861 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Russo, M. F., Lembo, E., Mari, A., Angelini, G., Verrastro, O., Nanni, G., Pompili, M., Raffaelli, M., Vecchio, F. M., Bornstein, S. R., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa892 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Li, L., Cong, C., Zhang, X., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity · doi:10.2147/dmso.s573711
“15 Filling this gap is crucial for determining whether diabetic status is a key effect modifier, thereby explaining inconsistent results in the literature and advancing toward more personalized therapeutic approaches.”
- Authors
- Bril, F., Kalavalapalli, S., Clark, V. C., Lomonaco, R., Soldevila-Pico, C., Liu, I.-C., Orsak, B., Tio, F., & Cusi, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida Health (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cusi, Kenneth
- Venue
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 558-566.e2
- ISSN
- 1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2775026689
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 12 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 14.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- pioglitazone, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, insulin sensitivity, hepatic steatosis, liver fibrosis, NASH resolution, thiazolidinediones, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, adipose tissue insulin sensitivity, alanine aminotransferase, liver histopathology, glucose turnover
- MeSH terms
- Pioglitazone, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Histocytochemistry, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Prospective Studies, Texas, Treatment Outcome, Protective Agents, Young Adult, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review