Cited by 199Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Treatment and Management

Response to Pioglitazone in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis With vs Without Type 2 Diabetes

Bril, Fernando, Kalavalapalli, Srilaxmi, Clark, Virginia C., Lomonaco, Romina, Soldevila-Pico, Consuelo, Liu, I-Chia, Orsak, Beverly, Tio, Fermin +1 more·2018·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims Pioglitazone is effective for long-term treatment of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. However, it is not clear how the presence of type 2 diabetes affects the drug's efficacy. We compared metabolic and histologic responses to pioglitazone in patients with NASH and prediabetes vs type 2 diabetes. Methods We performed a prospective study of adults with biopsy-proven NASH (52 with type 2 diabetes and 49 with prediabetes), enrolled from the general population of San Antonio, Texas, from 2008 through 2014. After a run-in period of approximately 4 weeks, when all baseline measurements were made (liver magnetic resonance proton spectroscopy, euglycemic insulin clamp with glucose turnover measurements, dual-energy absorptiometry, and liver biopsy), subjects were randomly assigned to groups given pioglitazone or placebo (45 mg/d) for 18 months; all procedures performed at baseline were then repeated. The primary outcome was a reduction in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score of 2 points or more (for at least 2 components) without worsening of fibrosis (and expressed as difference vs placebo). Secondary outcomes included NASH resolution, individual histologic components, intrahepatic triglyceride content (measured by 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy), and insulin sensitivity (measured by euglycemic insulin clamp). Results The primary outcome was met by 48% of patients with type 2 diabetes vs 46% without diabetes. Resolution of NASH was achieved in 44% of patients with type 2 diabetes vs 26% without diabetes. A significant reduction in fibrosis, from baseline, was observed only in patients with type 2 diabetes (P = .035). Intrahepatic triglyceride content was reduced by 11% ± 2% in patients with diabetes vs a reduction of 9% ± 2% in patients without diabetes (P = .62); the plasma level of alanine aminotransferase was reduced by 50 ± 10 U/L in patients with diabetes vs a reduction of 36 ± 5 U/L in patients without diabetes (P = .22). Pioglitazone was associated with a significantly greater insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue of patients with diabetes vs without diabetes (P < .001), but nonsignificant differences in responses in hepatic (P = .49) and skeletal muscle (P = .32) insulin sensitivity. Conclusions In a prospective study, we found pioglitazone to be effective in patients with and without type 2 diabetes. However, pioglitazone reduced liver fibrosis and increased adipose tissue insulin sensitivity at significantly greater levels in patients with type 2 diabetes than in patients with prediabetes. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms by which pioglitazone reduces liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00994682.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.001

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bril, F., Kalavalapalli, S., Clark, V. C., Lomonaco, R., Soldevila-Pico, C., Liu, I.-C., Orsak, B., Tio, F., & Cusi, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Cusi, Kenneth
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
558-566.e2
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2775026689
Cited by
199
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
14.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
pioglitazone, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, insulin sensitivity, hepatic steatosis, liver fibrosis, NASH resolution, thiazolidinediones, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, adipose tissue insulin sensitivity, alanine aminotransferase, liver histopathology, glucose turnover
MeSH terms
Pioglitazone, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Biopsy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Histocytochemistry, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Prospective Studies, Texas, Treatment Outcome, Protective Agents, Young Adult, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review