CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 236Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsReflective Practices in EducationStudent Assessment and Feedback

Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students' self-regulated learning competence

van den Boom, Gerard, Paas, Fred, van Merriënboer, Jeroen J.G., van Gog, Tamara·2004·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reflection prompts combined with tutor feedback had positive effects on the development of students' self-regulated learning competence.

    “An indication for the practical value of reflection prompts was provided by a study of Van den Boom et al. (2004) who found that reflection prompts combined with tutor feedback had positive effects on the development of students' self-regulated learning competence.”

    From Interactivity in Video-based Models (2007) · cites this paper as Van den Boom et al. (2004)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 236

Authors
van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T.
Affiliations
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
ORCID
Paas, Fred
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-07
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
551-567
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001
OpenAlex
W1991481748
Cited by
236
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
reflection prompts, tutor feedback, web-based learning environment, distance education, student self-regulation, learning styles, student perceptions, electronic feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review