The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.
Naegele, K. D., & Goffman, E. (1956) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089106 · Cited by 26,048
Flesch, R. (1948) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0057532 · Cited by 5,391
Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction
WALTHER, J. B. (1996) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365096023001001 · Cited by 4,798
Self-citationPresentation of Self in Everyday Life, the
&, L. L. K., & Holtz‐Bacha, C. (2008) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412953993.n530 · Cited by 3,796
Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.
Snyder, M. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037039 · Cited by 3,525
Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction
Walther, J. B. (1992) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365092019001003 · Cited by 2,664
Self-citationSocial psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.10.1123 · Cited by 2,630
Psychological perspectives on the self
Suls, J. M., & Greenwald, A. G. (1982) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 2,300
Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1969.11023575 · Cited by 1,854
Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding
Scott, W. A. (1955) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266577 · Cited by 1,853
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Jones, 1982, Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation, Vol. 1, 231
- Landis, D. (1994). Cyberspace as a frontier for romance. USA Today, sec. D, pp. 1–2.
- Reid, E. M. (1991). Electropolis: Communication and community on Internet Relay Chat. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Melbourne. http://www.ee.mu.oz.au/papers/emr/electropolis.html (retrieved December 25, 1996).
- Witt, 2004, An initial examination of observed verbal immediacy and participants’ opinions of communication effectiveness in online group interaction, Journal of Online Behavior, 2
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–915 of 915
Emotional reactivity to delayed replies: Temporal dynamics, context, and age differences
Kato, Y., & Kato, S. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101261
Su, L., & Li, X. (2026) · Communication and the Public · doi:10.1177/20570473261477124
The Digitalization of Dating Dynamics: Recent Trends and Future Directions
Konings, F. (2026) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1530-353520260000038012
Rousseau, A., & Trekels, J. (2026) · Journal of Children and Media · doi:10.1080/17482798.2026.2694774
Casale, S., Balcerowska, J. M., & Ghinassi, S. (2026) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-026-00789-1
Cultural echoes in e-WOM: the role of self-presentation in brand agility perception
Bozkurt, S., Colmekcioglu, N., & Gligor, D. (2026) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/imr-05-2025-0234
Lew, Z., Low, J., & Mar, Y. (2026) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmag023
Zhdanova, A. N. (2026) · Optical Memory and Neural Networks · doi:10.3103/s1060992x26700116
Xu, F.-T., & Wang, L.-Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1986473
Meng, Y., Ye, L., Sun, Y., Liu, B., Lu, H., & Ding, X. (2026) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3785651.3831521
Dawel, A., Monaghan, C., Shou, Y., Mewton, P., Farrer, L. M., Gulliver, A., Newman, E. J., McCallum, S. M., & Cherbuin, N. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2735496
Kato, S., & Kato, Y. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101401
The Affordance Utilization Model: The Role of Affordances as Relationships Develop
Ruppel, E. K. (2011) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)
Power dichotomies : an exploratory comparison between online and offline spaces.
Coote, S. (2015) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/5192
Metadata
- Authors
- Walther, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Walther, Joseph B.
- ORCID
- Walther, Joseph B.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2538-2557
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999297692
- Cited by
- 915
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 16.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- computer-mediated communication, self-presentation, impression management, personal language, sentence complexity, gender differences, social status, compensatory behavior, overcompensation, cognitive awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review