CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,854Deception detection and forensic psychologyLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception †

Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V.·1969·Psychiatry
DOI 10.1080/00332747.1969.11023575
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract : Research relevant to psychotherapy regarding facial expression and body movement, has shown that the kind of information which can be gleaned from the patients words - information about affects, attitudes, interpersonal styles, psychodynamics - can also be derived from his concomitant nonverbal behavior. The study explores the interaction situation, and considers how within deception interactions differences in neuroanatomy and cultural influences combine to produce specific types of body movements and facial expressions which escape efforts to deceive and emerge as leakage or deception clues.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00332747.1969.11023575

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The term masking was used in 1969 to mean concealing disgust and has since come to be used within the autistic community to mean hiding one's symptoms.

    “The term masking was used in 1969 to mean concealing disgust (Ekman & Friesen, 1969) and has since come to be used within the autistic community to mean hiding one’s symptoms (Milton & Sims, 2016; Willey & Attwood, 2015).”

    From The experiences of adults with ADHD in interpersonal relationships and online communities: A qualitative study (2023) · cites this paper as Ekman & Friesen, 1969

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ekman Paul, 1968, Social Science Information
  2. Freud Sigmund, 1959, Collected Papers, 3
  3. Ruesch Jurgen, 1956, Nonverbal Communication

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V.
Affiliations
Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital and Clinics (US)
Venue
Psychiatry
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1969-02
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
88-106
ISSN
  • 0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-281X
DOI
10.1080/00332747.1969.11023575
OpenAlex
W1854318472
Cited by
1,854
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 51
FWCI
9.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
deception, nonverbal behavior, facial expressions, body movement, deception cues, leakage, psychotherapy, interaction situations, neuroanatomy, cultural influence
MeSH terms
Affect, Arousal, Cues, Depression, Ego, Facial Expression, Feedback, Humans, Kinesics, Movement, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychoanalytic Theory, Psychotherapy, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review