The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/63.2.482 · Cited by 1,731
Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L. F., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238 · Cited by 1,064 · cited 2×
“People sharing an intimate relationship communicate more frequently, discussing topics of a wider breadth, and the depth of self-disclosure is deep (Laurenceau et al., 1998; Marsden & Campbell, 1984).”
BackgroundThe top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone
Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., & Andrews, D. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.015 · Cited by 1,038 · cited 3×
“In later studies (Nonnecke, Preece, Andrews, & Voutour, 2004; Preece et al., 2004), it was found that lurking was a post joining developed habit rather than a conscious decision from the outset.”
BackgroundInfluentialComputer Networks As Social Networks
Wellman, B. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1065547 · Cited by 918
Computer anxiety: sex, race and age
Gilroy, F. D., & Desai, H. B. (1986) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(86)80084-0 · Cited by 206
Cited by
An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use
Kwon, O., & Wen, Y. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.011 · Cited by 722
Lee, Y., & Kwon, O. (2011) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.11.005 · Cited by 343
Pai, P., & Arnott, D. C. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.025 · Cited by 263
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010 · Cited by 225
Liu, D., & Brown, B. B. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.003 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Rau, P.-L. P., Gao, Q., & Ding, Y.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2757-2770
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130918980
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.001
- The paper
- Rau, P.-L. P., Gao, Q., & Ding, Y. (2008). Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
