CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 172Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Capital and NetworksMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-disclosure on social networking sites, positive feedback, and social capital among Chinese college students

Liu, Dong, Brown, B. Bradford·2014·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.003

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bazarova, 2012, Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook, Journal of Communication, 62, 815, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01664.x · DOI
  2. Chang, 2014, Visiting theories that predict college students’ self-disclosure on Facebook, Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 79, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.059 · DOI
  3. Coleman, 1988, Social capital in the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95, 10.1086/228943 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Donath, 2004, Public displays of connection, Bt Technology Journal, 22, 71, 10.1023/B:BTTJ.0000047585.06264.cc · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ellison, 2007, The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social networking sites, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gerdes, 1994, Emotional, social, and academic adjustment of college students: A longitudinal study of retention, Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 281, 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb00935.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Granovetter, 1973, The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360, 10.1086/225469 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Greenhow, 2011, Help from My “Friends”: Social capital in the social network sites of low-income students, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45, 223, 10.2190/EC.45.2.f · DOI
  9. Hollenbaugh, 2014, Facebook self-disclosure: Examining the role of traits, social cohesion, and motives, Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 50, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.055 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Jang, 2009, Topic avoidance in close relationships: applying the theory of planned behavior, Human Communication, 12, 119
  11. Lapsley, 1989, Psychological separation and adjustment to college, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 286, 10.1037/0022-0167.36.3.286 · DOI
  12. Lee, 2009, Online communication and adolescent social ties: Who benefits from internet use?, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 509, 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01451.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. Li-Barber, 2012, Self-disclosure and student satisfaction with Facebook, Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 624, 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.008 · DOI
  14. Limperos, 2014, “It’s Not Who You Know, but Who You Add:” An investigation into the differential impact of friend adding and self-disclosure on interpersonal perceptions on Facebook, Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 496, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.037 · DOI
  15. Maksl, 2013, Affording to exchange: Social capital and online information sharing, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 588, 10.1089/cyber.2012.0430 · DOI
  16. Mazer, 2007, I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate, Communication Education, 56, 1, 10.1080/03634520601009710 · DOI
  17. Miller, 1983, Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234, 10.1037/0022-3514.44.6.1234 · DOI
  18. Nosko, 2010, All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 406, 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.012 · DOI
  19. Park, 2011, Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook, Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1974, 10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.004 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Rau, 2008, Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services, Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2757, 10.1016/j.chb.2008.04.001 · DOI
  21. Seidman, 2014, Expressing the “True Self” on Facebook, Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 367, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.052 · DOI
  22. Sheldon, 2009, “I’ll poke you. You’ll poke me!” Self-disclosure, social attraction, predictability and trust as important predictors of Facebook relationships, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3
  23. Siibak, 2009, Constructing the self through the photo selection-visual impression management on social networking websites, Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 3, 1
  24. Tifferet, 2014, Gender differences in Facebook self-presentation: An international randomized study, Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 388, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.016 · DOI
  25. Trepte, 2013, The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study, Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1102, 10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Tufekci, 2008, Grooming, gossip, Facebook and MySpace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won’t assimilate?, Information, Communication and Society, 11, 544, 10.1080/13691180801999050 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Valkenburg, 2011, Gender differences in online and offline self-disclosure in pre-adolescence and adolescence, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 253, 10.1348/2044-835X.002001 · DOI
  28. Walker, 1976, Self-disclosure in friendship, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 735, 10.2466/pms.1976.42.3.735 · DOI
  29. Walther, 2008, The role of friends’ appearance and behavior on evaluations of individuals on Facebook: Are we known by the company we keep?, Human Communication Research, 34, 28, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00312.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liu, D., & Brown, B. B.
Affiliations
  • Renmin University of China (CN)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Dong
ORCID
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
38
Pages
213-219
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.003
OpenAlex
W2111743158
Cited by
172
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
21.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
self-disclosure, social networking sites, positive feedback, social capital, bridging social capital, bonding social capital, university students, social skills, social adaptation, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review