Cited by 167Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended LearningTeam Dynamics and Performance

Group Awareness Tools: It’s What You Do with It That Matters

Open access
Janssen, Jeroen, Erkens, Gijsbert, Kirschner, Paul A.·2011·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.002

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Kirschner, P. A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Janssen, Jeroen
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
1046-1058
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996489397
Cited by
167
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
online collaboration, group awareness, student participation, equality of participation, collaborative writing, mediation, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review