Effects of computer-based testing on test performance and testing motivation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Computer-based assessments have the potential to provide better evidence for construct validity by collecting data on how students approach tasks when solving real-world problems.
“computer-based assessments have the potential to provide better evidence for construct validity, by collecting data describing how students approach tasks when they are involved in solving real-world problems”
From Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy (2016) · cites this paper as Chua, 2012
Cites
An extension of control group design
Solomon, R. L. (1949) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0062958 · Cited by 541 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To attain the objective of this study, this study employs the Sol-omon four-group experimental design (Solomon, 1949).”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
- Authors
- Piaw Chua, Y.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1580-1586
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056151827
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- computer-based testing, paper-and-pencil tests, test performance, self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, social motivation, testing time, test validity, pre-service teachers, green computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
