The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the User Engagement Scale
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,866
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,265
Flow: the psychology of optimal experience
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0597 · Cited by 12,637
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · cited 4×
“Work by Appleton, Christenson, Kim, and Reschly (2006), Fredricks, Blumenfeld, and Paris (2004) have developed a sophisticated, multifaceted view of engagement that can be conceptualized at many different levels.”
BackgroundInfluential(2007) · Cited by 10,092
Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience
Buchanan, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991) · Design Issues · doi:10.2307/1511458 · Cited by 9,394
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159 · cited 1×
“…and usability have a long, established history in research in human–computer interaction (cf., Shneiderman, 1998) and form the backbone of well-established frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model (Bourgonjon, Valcke, Soetaert, & Schellens, 2010; Venkatesh & Bala, 2008).”
MethodConstructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction
(1993) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90471-k · Cited by 5,587
Cited by
Boyle, E. A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., Lim, T., Ninaus, M., Ribeiro, C., & Pereira, J. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003 · Cited by 1,133
O’Brien, H. L., Cairns, P., & Hall, M. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004 · Cited by 1,014
Shin, D. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012 · Cited by 738
Facilitating empathy through virtual reality
Schutte, N. S., & Stilinović, E. J. (2017) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-017-9641-7 · Cited by 358
Högberg, J., Hamari, J., & Wästlund, E. (2019) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-019-09223-w · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiebe, E. N., Lamb, A., Hardy, M., & Sharek, D.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 123-132
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097541468
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 49.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the User Engagement Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.001
- The paper
- Wiebe, E. N., Lamb, A., Hardy, M., & Sharek, D. (2014). Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the User Engagement Scale. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
