Managing privacy boundaries together: Exploring individual and group privacy management strategies in Facebook
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Governance decisions in decentralized social media are typically made by instance administrators, who tend to be more responsive and accessible than executives of large, centrally-operated social media platforms during times of user dissatisfaction.
“Governance decisions are typically made by instance administrators [5,32], who tend to be more responsive and accessible than the executives of large, centrally-operated social media platforms [4,56,119] during times of user dissatisfaction.”
From Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Information Privacy Research: an Interdisciplinary Review1
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409970 · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis.
Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.002 · Cited by 1,919 · see citing works
Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook
Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11957454_3 · Cited by 1,895 · see citing works
Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships.
Zhao, S., Grasmuck, S., & Martin, J. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.012 · Cited by 1,848 · see citing works
Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444810385389 · Cited by 1,349 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research has shown that SNSs are a place to meet with your offline friends (e.g., Ellison et al., 2011).”
BackgroundHogan, B. (2010) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467610385893 · Cited by 1,318 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The latter goes hand in hand with the common denominator approach of Hogan (2010), whereby users treat SNSs as a front stage and only post information that is suitable for every public.1 CPM was developed before the emergence of SNSs as a widespread communication tool.”
BackgroundCan You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites
Tüfekçi, Z. (2007) · Bulletin of Science Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467607311484 · Cited by 876 · see citing works
The Role of Push-Pull Technology in Privacy Calculus: The Case of Location-Based Services
Xu, H., Teo, H., Tan, B. C. Y., & Agarwal, R. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260305 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances
Xu, H., Dinev, T., Smith, J., & Hart, P. (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00281 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities
Ren, Y., Kraut, R. E., & Kiesler, S. B. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607076007 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J. A., & Christakis, N. A. (2008) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01432.x · Cited by 597 · see citing works
The Impact of Context Collapse and Privacy on Social Network Site Disclosures
Vitak, J. (2012) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732140 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Facebook privacy settings: Who cares?
boyd, D., & Hargittai, E. (2010) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v15i8.3086 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked PublicsPreprint
boyd, D. (2017) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/edq6c · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. (1994) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167294205005 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships
Wright, K. B., & Webb, L. M. (2011) · doi:10.3726/b12772 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2010.516719 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: Understanding privacy in the age of Facebook
Raynes-Goldie, K. (2010) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v15i1.2775 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
PRIVACY PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON FACEBOOK: The Internet privacy paradox revisited
Young, A. L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2013) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.777757 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
DiMicco, J. M., & Millen, D. R. (2007) · International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) · doi:10.1145/1316624.1316682 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Silent Listeners: The Evolution of Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook
Stutzman, F., Ralph Gross, A., & Acquisti, A. (2013) · Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality · doi:10.29012/jpc.v4i2.620 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Vitak, J., & Ellison, N. (2013) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812451566 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
(2009) · Issue Lab (Candid) · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Lampinen, A., Lehtinen, V., Lehmuskallio, A., & Tamminen, S. (2011) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979420 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites
Stutzman, F., Capra, R., & Thompson, J. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.017 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Without You, I'm Nothing: Performances of the Self on Twitter
Papacharissi, Z. (2012) · International journal of communication · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Understanding social network site users’ privacy tool use
Litt, E. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.049 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Blog scrubbing: Exploring triggers that change privacy rules
Child, J. T., Petronio, S., Agyeman-Budu, E. A., & Westermann, D. A. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.009 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
The influence of information sensitivity compensation on privacy concern and behavioral intention
Yang, S., & Wang, K. (2009) · ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1496930.1496937 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Hargittai, E., & Litt, E. (2013) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msp.2013.64 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Social Network Sites as Virtual Communities
Parks, M. R. (2010) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203876527-12 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Reframing Privacy 2.0 in Online Social Networks
Xu, H. (2012) · Penn Carey Law Legal Scholarship Repository (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Beliefs and Uses of Tagging Among Undergraduates
Kramer‐Duffield, J. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/yvsa-ye92 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers
Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9734-1 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Trust and Friction: Negotiating How Information Flows through Decentralized Social Media
Hwang, S., Nanayakkara, P., & Shvartzshnaider, Y. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757516 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Seeing the Politics of Decentralized Social Media Protocols
Oshinowo, T., Hwang, S., Zhang, A. X., & Monroy-Hernández, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3816995 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Governance decisions are typically made by instance administrators [5, 32], who tend to be more responsive and accessible than the executives of large, centrally-operated social media platforms [4, 56, 119] during times of user dissatisfaction.”
- Authors
- De Wolf, R., Willaert, K., & Pierson, J.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 444-454
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072499299
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 28.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- privacy management, group privacy, Facebook, social network sites, communication privacy management theory, gender differences, youth organizations, online privacy behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
