Machiavellianism, self-monitoring, self-promotion and relational aggression on Facebook
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machiavellianism has been linked to increased relational aggression in both adults and children.
“In this context, Machiavellianism has been linked to increased relational aggression in both adults and children, indicating that the cold, calculating nature suits a less direct and less physical use of force (29, 30).”
From Empathy at the heart of darkness: empathy deficits that bind the dark triad and those that mediate indirect relational aggression. (2019) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 133
- Authors
- Abell, L., & Brewer, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Lancashire (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Abell, L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 258-262
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015661666
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 12.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- Machiavellianism, self-monitoring, self-promotion, relational aggression, Facebook, social networking sites, online behavior, gender differences, dishonesty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
