Cited by 31Online and Blended LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

A multivariate investigation of gender differences in the number of online tests received-checking for perceived self-regulation

Basol, Gulsah, Balgalmis, Esra·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A third (33%) of the reviewed papers focused on assessment including summative and formative assessment, online exams, marking, and feedback.

    “A third (33%) of the reviewed papers focused on assessment including summative and formative assessment, online exams, marking, and feedback (Adesemowo et al., 2016; Albano & Dello Iacono, 2019; Basol & Balgalmis, 2016; George-Williams et al., 2019).”

    From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Basol & Balgalmis, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basol, G., & Balgalmis, E.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
58
Pages
388-397
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2271729462
Cited by
31
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
16.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
gender differences, formative assessment, online quizzes, student self-regulation, online assessment, pre-service teachers, blended learning, Moodle, online course management systems, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review