The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of mobile retailing on consumers' purchasing experiences: A dynamic perspective
Open accessAbstract
The emerging retail culture is characterized by the extensive use of mobile technologies, high connectivity, ubiquitous computing and contactless technologies, which enable consumers to experience shopping differently. In fact, innovative mobile technologies provide new tools (apps) which are able to separate the moment of purchase from the moment of effective consumption, by allowing consumers to make purchases by mobile phone and collect them at home or at a store (a pick-up boutique or collection point), in addition to the traditional in-store service (purchase in the store and collect/consume in the store). The aim of this paper is to understand the extent to which mobile technologies have an impact on consumer behaviour, with emphasis on the drivers motivating consumers to adopt the consumer experience of mobile shopping. To achieve this goal we used a qualitative approach involving 29 consumers in the Italian market, where mobile shopping is still at an early stage. The findings shed a light on the extent to which consumers are moving from e-channels to mobile channels and take into account the effect of these technological innovations in retail settings from a cognitive standpoint, where studies are limited. The implications for researchers and practitioners are then discussed, with emphasis on retailers need to develop new mobile service competences, and integrate and synthetize physical retail settings with mobile opportunities and functionalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/hebz/9780198869443.001.0001 · Cited by 10,965
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies
Verhoef, P. C., Lemon, K. N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2009) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.001 · Cited by 3,140
On the Go: how mobile shopping affects customer purchase behavior.
Wang, R. J.-H., Malthouse, E. C., & Krishnamurthi, L. (2015) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2015.01.002 · Cited by 559
Mobile marketing: A literature review on its value for consumers and retailers
Ström, R., Vendel, M., & Bredican, J. (2014) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.12.003 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Generation Z consumers’ expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda
Priporas, C.-V., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058 · Cited by 838
Self-citationConstituents and consequences of smart customer experience in retailing
Roy, S. K., Balaji, M. S., Sadeque, S., Nguyen, B., & Melewar, T. C. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.022 · Cited by 348
Examining the antecedents and consequences of mobile app engagement
Kim, S., & Baek, T. H. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.008 · Cited by 203
Ng, S. I., Ho, J. A., Lim, X. J., Chong, K. L., & Latiff, K. (2021) · Young Consumers · doi:10.1108/yc-06-2019-1006 · Cited by 92
Enyejo, J. O., Obani, O. Q., Afolabi, O., Igba, E., & Ibokette, A. I. (2024) · Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews · doi:10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0116 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Pantano, E., & Priporas, C.-V.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 548-555
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2517142559
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 63.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.