Social media use, community participation and psychological well-being among individuals with serious mental illnesses
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
More frequent use of social media among a sample of individuals with serious mental illness was associated with greater civic engagement, reflected as voting in local elections.
“as well as greater civic engagement, reflected as voting in local elections (Brusilovskiy et al., 2016).”
From Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice (2020) · cites this paper as Brusilovskiy et al., 2016
More frequent use of social media among a sample of individuals with serious mental illness was associated with greater community participation, measured as participation in shopping, work, religious activities or visiting friends and family.
“more frequent use of social media among a sample of individuals with serious mental illness was associated with greater community participation, measured as participation in shopping, work, religious activities or visiting friends and family”
From Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice (2020) · cites this paper as Brusilovskiy et al., 2016
Among individuals receiving publicly funded mental health services who use social media, nearly half (47%) reported using these platforms at least weekly to feel less alone.
“Among individuals receiving publicly funded mental health services who use social media, nearly half (47%) reported using these platforms at least weekly to feel less alone (Brusilovskiy, Townley, Snethen, & Salzer, 2016).”
From Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice (2020) · cites this paper as Brusilovskiy, Townley, Snethen, & Salzer, 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Brusilovskiy, E., Townley, G., Snethen, G., & Salzer, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- Portland State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brusilovskiy, Eugene
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 232-240
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2513057532
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 26.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (90RT5021-02-00)
- National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- social media use, severe mental illness, community participation, citizen participation, psychological well-being, loneliness, quality of life, psychiatric symptoms, social networking sites, social reintegration, voting behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
