Cited by 750Mental Health via WritingDigital Mental Health InterventionsImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Social Media and Mental Health: Benefits, Risks, and Opportunities for Research and Practice

Open access
Naslund, John A., Bondre, Ameya, Torous, John, Aschbrenner, Kelly A.·2020·Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science

Abstract

Social media platforms are popular venues for sharing personal experiences, seeking information, and offering peer-to-peer support among individuals living with mental illness. With significant shortfalls in the availability, quality, and reach of evidence-based mental health services across the United States and globally, social media platforms may afford new opportunities to bridge this gap. However, caution is warranted, as numerous studies highlight risks of social media use for mental health. In this commentary, we consider the role of social media as a potentially viable intervention platform for offering support to persons with mental disorders, promoting engagement and retention in care, and enhancing existing mental health services. Specifically, we summarize current research on the use of social media among mental health service users, and early efforts using social media for the delivery of evidence-based programs. We also review the risks, potential harms, and necessary safety precautions with using social media for mental health. To conclude, we explore opportunities using data science and machine learning, for example by leveraging social media for detecting mental disorders and developing predictive models aimed at characterizing the aetiology and progression of mental disorders. These various efforts using social media, as summarized in this commentary, hold promise for improving the lives of individuals living with mental disorders.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This commentary reviews evidence that social media is widely used by people with mental illness and may support social interaction, peer support, and engagement in services, while also carrying risks for symptoms, hostile interactions, and daily life. It argues that benefits should not yet be viewed as outweighing harms and calls for safeguards, ethical attention, and further research, including digital phenotyping and machine learning.

Key findings

  • Social media use is common among psychiatric populations: about 70% among middle-aged/older individuals and those with serious mental illness, 72% among peer support agency respondents, 68% daily use among first-episode psychosis, over 97% among adolescents/young adults with psychotic or mood disorders, and 98% among adolescents recruited from community mental health centers; in 2020 there were an estimated 3.8 billion social media users worldwide, half the global population.
  • Potential benefits include facilitating social interaction, access to peer support networks, and promoting engagement/retention in services; in a HORYZONS pilot, 95% engaged with the peer-to-peer networking feature and there were significant reductions in depression, while PeerFIT’s private Facebook group appeared to increase engagement.
  • Risks include associations between heavy/prolonged social media use and anxiety/depressive symptoms; using 7–11 platforms versus 2 or fewer was associated with 3 times greater odds of high depressive symptoms and 3.2 times greater odds of high anxiety symptoms; cyberbullying is linked to depression/anxiety, with females twice as likely to be victims; youth with moderate-to-severe depressive symptoms were more likely to report hostile comments or being “trolled” (31% vs. 14%); over one third of social media users with serious mental illness expressed privacy concerns.
  • Emerging opportunities include using machine learning and digital phenotyping on Twitter/Instagram data to study depression, schizophrenia communication patterns, and illness onset/course, though ethical concerns about consent, identifiability, and stigma remain.

Methods

  • This is a commentary/narrative review, not a systematic review; the authors searched Medline and Google Scholar using terms “mental health” or “mental illness” and “social media,” and searched reference lists of recent reviews and relevant studies.
  • They did not perform a systematic search or apply specific inclusion criteria based on study design or type of mental disorder.
  • The main analysis is a narrative synthesis of benefits, risks, and future directions, without meta-analysis or new primary data.

Limitations

  • Stated: the review is not systematic or exhaustive; it only summarizes published studies, omitting private-sector or gray literature; it did not assess risk of bias; few intervention studies reported negative findings, suggesting possible publication bias; and most studies were from the United States or other high-income settings, with a dearth of research in low- and middle-income countries.
  • Evident and stated: many included studies are cross-sectional, making it difficult to draw conclusions about direction of causation.
  • Evident: as a commentary, it relies on secondary literature and does not present original empirical findings.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41347-020-00134-x

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

62 of 138 cited sources checked · 38 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    For individuals who openly discuss mental health problems on Twitter, this served as an important opportunity to seek support and to hear about the experiences of others.

    “For individuals who openly discuss mental health problems on Twitter, a study by Berry et al. (2017) found that this served as an important opportunity to seek support and to hear about the experiences of others (Berry et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Berry et al., 2017 source
  • Premisecitation

    Some individuals may prefer to seek help for mental health concerns online rather than through in-person encounters.

    “while other studies have found that some individuals may prefer to seek help for mental health concerns online rather than through in-person encounters (Batterham & Calear, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Batterham & Calear, 2017 source
  • Premisecitation

    Individuals self-identified as having a schizophrenia spectrum disorder reported that visiting social media sites was one of their most common activities when using digital devices, taking up roughly 2 hours each day.

    “Individuals who self-identified as having a schizophrenia spectrum disorder responded to a survey shared through the National Alliance of Mental Illness (NAMI), and reported that visiting social media sites was one of their most common activities when using digital devices, taking up roughly 2 hours each day (Gay, Torous, Joseph, Pandya, & Duckworth, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gay, Torous, Joseph, Pandya, & Duckworth, 2016 source
  • Premisecitation

    In a qualitative study, participants with schizophrenia described greater anonymity, the ability to discover that other people have experienced similar health challenges, and reducing fears through greater access to information as important motivations for using the Internet to seek mental health information.

    “In a qualitative study, participants with schizophrenia described greater anonymity, the ability to discover that other people have experienced similar health challenges, and reducing fears through greater access to information as important motivations for using the Internet to seek mental health information (Schrank, Sibitz, Unger, & Amering, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schrank, Sibitz, Unger, & Amering, 2010 source
  • Premisecitation

    Individuals with mental disorders are increasingly gaining access to and using mobile devices, such as smartphones.

    “Recent studies have shown that individuals with mental disorders are increasingly gaining access to and using mobile devices, such as smartphones”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Firth et al., 2015 source

      The Results and Discussion report that mobile-phone ownership increased over time among people with psychosis, and the Results report daily use by some phone owners. The study does not establish an increasing trend in use or smartphone ownership, and its findings on ownership are specific to psychotic disorders rather than mental disorders generally. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Glick, Druss, Pina, Lally, & Conde, 2016 source
    • cites Torous, Chan, et al., 2014 source

      The Discussion’s Principal Findings report that 62.5% of surveyed psychiatric outpatients owned smartphones and that 70.6% were interested in using them to monitor symptoms. The paper predicts that access and engagement will grow, but its survey does not establish that ownership or actual use was increasing over time. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 37
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many individuals with mental illness turn to social media to share their personal experiences, seek information about their mental health and treatment options, and give and receive support from others facing similar mental health challenges.

    “Other exploratory studies have found that many of these individuals with mental illness appear to turn to social media to share their personal experiences, seek information about their mental health and treatment options, and give and receive support from others facing similar mental health challenges”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bucci, Schwannauer, & Berry, 2019 source
    • cites Naslund, Aschbrenner, Marsch, & Bartels, 2016b source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Individuals living with a range of mental disorders, including depression, psychotic disorders, or other severe mental illnesses, use social media platforms at comparable rates as the general population, with use ranging from about 70% among middle-age and older individuals to upwards of 97% among younger individuals.

    “Studies have reported that individuals living with a range of mental disorders, including depression, psychotic disorders, or other severe mental illnesses, use social media platforms at comparable rates as the general population”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Aschbrenner, Naslund, Grinley, et al., 2018 source

      The Results and Discussion report that social media use among peer support agency users with mental illness was comparable to use in the general adult population; the Discussion gives a rate of 72%. Our copy does not establish the claimed range up to 97% among younger people or comparable rates separately for depression and psychotic disorders. The supplied verbatim citing sentence does not include the age-specific percentages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites M. L. Birnbaum et al., 2017 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) says that individuals with mental illness regularly use social media and that youth with newly diagnosed schizophrenia use it frequently. It does not establish comparable usage rates with the general population or report the claimed 70%–97% age-based range. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Brunette et al., 2019 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There remains uncertainty regarding the risks and potential harms of social media for mental health and how best to weigh these concerns against potential benefits.

    “However, there remains uncertainty regarding the risks and potential harms of social media for mental health (Orben & Przybylski, 2019), and how best to weigh these concerns against potential benefits.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Orben & Przybylski, 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a sample of adolescents ages 13-18 recruited from community mental health centers, 98% reported using social media, with YouTube as the most popular platform, followed by Instagram and Snapchat.

    “Similarly, in a sample of adolescents ages 13-18 recruited from community mental health centers, 98% reported using social media, with YouTube as the most popular platform, followed by Instagram and Snapchat (Aschbrenner et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Aschbrenner et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    For adolescents and young adults ages 12 to 21 with psychotic disorders and mood disorders, over 97% reported using social media, with average use exceeding 2.5 hours per day.

    “For adolescents and young adults ages 12 to 21 with psychotic disorders and mood disorders, over 97% reported using social media, with average use exceeding 2.5 hours per day (M. L. Birnbaum et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites M. L. Birnbaum et al., 2017 source

      The Introduction says youth with newly diagnosed schizophrenia use social media frequently and spend several hours per day online. It does not give the claimed figure of over 97%, specify ages 12–21, or report average use exceeding 2.5 hours per day for a group including youth with mood disorders. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a content analysis of YouTube comments by individuals self-identifying as having serious mental illness, there appeared to be opportunities to feel less alone, provide hope, find support and learn through mutual reciprocity, and share coping strategies for day-to-day challenges.

    “In a content analysis of comments posted to YouTube by individuals who self-identified as having a serious mental illness, there appeared to be opportunities to feel less alone, provide hope, find support and learn through mutual reciprocity, and share coping strategies for day-to-day challenges of living with a mental illness (Naslund, Grande, Aschbrenner, & Elwyn, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naslund, Grande, Aschbrenner, & Elwyn, 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In data from 2017, approximately 70% of individuals with serious mental illness in treatment used social media, comparable to low-income groups from the general population.

    “as reflected in a study with data from 2017 showing comparable rates of social media use (approximately 70%) among individuals with serious mental illness in treatment as compared to low-income groups from the general population (Brunette et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brunette et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cyberbullying disproportionately impacts females; in a national survey of US adolescents, females were twice as likely to be victims of cyberbullying compared to males.

    “females were twice as likely to be victims of cyberbullying compared to males (Alhajji, Bass, & Dai, 2019)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alhajji, Bass, & Dai, 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a computational study of mental health awareness campaigns on Twitter, stigmatizing content was rare but was the most spread (re-tweeted).

    “while stigmatizing content was rare, it was actually the most spread (re-tweeted) demonstrating that harmful content can travel quickly on social media (Saha et al., 2019)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saha et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Peer-to-peer support appeared to offer feasible and acceptable ways to augment digital mental health interventions for individuals with psychotic disorders by improving engagement, compliance, and adherence, and may also improve perceived social support.

    “A recent review by Biagianti et al (2018) found that peer-to-peer support appeared to offer feasible and acceptable ways to augment digital mental health interventions for individuals with psychotic disorders by specifically improving engagement, compliance, and adherence to the interventions, and may also improve perceived social support (Biagianti, Quraishi, & Schlosser, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Biagianti, Quraishi, & Schlosser, 2018 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The detrimental effects of screen time on mental health include increased severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms, and these effects have been well documented.

    “This may partly be driven by the detrimental effects of screen time on mental health, including increased severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms, which have been well documented (Stiglic & Viner, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stiglic & Viner, 2019 source

      The Results section (Mental health and well-being) reports moderately strong evidence of an association between screen time and depressive symptoms, but only weak evidence for an association with anxiety. The paper describes associations rather than establishing that screen time causes increased symptom severity, so the claim overstates the evidence, particularly for anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Individuals with serious mental illness have emphasized that any mental health intervention on social media would need to be moderated by someone with adequate training and credentials, would need to have ground rules and ways to promote safety and minimize risks, and would need to be free and easy to access.

    “Importantly, individuals with serious mental illness have also emphasized that any mental health intervention on social media would need to be moderated by someone with adequate training and credentials, would need to have ground rules and ways to promote safety and minimize risks, and importantly, would need to be free and easy to access.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naslund et al., 2017 source

      The Conclusions (page unavailable) say that privacy risks, harms, and overall safety are critical considerations for social-media mental health programs. But the paper does not report participants emphasizing trained and credentialed moderation, ground rules, or free and easy access as requirements; the Discussion reports their interest in such programs, not those conditions. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Making social media data identifiable in ways not originally intended by the user who posted the content could place an individual at risk of harm or divulge sensitive health information.

    “Precautions are needed to ensure that data is not made identifiable in ways that were not originally intended by the user who posted the content, as this could place an individual at risk of harm or divulge sensitive health information (Webb et al., 2017; Williams, Burnap, & Sloan, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Webb et al., 2017 source

      Section 4.3, p. 6, says users may not expect their tweets to be republished for other audiences and that revealing their identities could put them at risk of harm. Section 4.4, p. 7, explains how published tweet text can reveal a user's identity through search. The passages do not support the specific claim about divulging sensitive health information. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Williams, Burnap, & Sloan, 2017 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gender minorities are more likely to experience mental health problems and more likely to experience online victimization when compared to heterosexual individuals.

    “these individuals are more likely to experience mental health problems and more likely to experience online victimization when compared to heterosexual individuals (Mereish, Sheskier, Hawthorne, & Goldbach, 2019)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mereish, Sheskier, Hawthorne, & Goldbach, 2019 source

      The Results ('Depressive symptoms, suicidality, substance use, and victimisation') report higher rates of depressive symptoms and cyber victimisation among Black sexual minority young people than among heterosexual participants. The claim says 'gender minorities,' but the study compares groups by sexual orientation, not gender-minority status. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: Less is known about use of social media for seeking support for mental health concerns among gender minorities.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The reported risks of social media use were directly related to many aspects of everyday life, including concerns about threats to employment, fear of stigma and being judged, impact on personal relationships, and facing hostility or being hurt.

    “The reported risks of social media use were directly related to many aspects of everyday life, including concerns about threats to employment, fear of stigma and being judged, impact on personal relationships, and facing hostility or being hurt (Naslund & Aschbrenner, 2019)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naslund & Aschbrenner, 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Many studies highlighted risks associated with social media use for individuals living with mental illness, but few studies of programs or interventions reported negative findings.

    “We found many studies that highlighted risks associated with social media use for individuals living with mental illness; however, few studies of programs or interventions reported negative findings, suggesting the possibility that negative findings may go unpublished.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The commentary did not perform a systematic search of the literature and did not apply specific inclusion criteria based on study design or type of mental disorder.

    “Given this broad objective, we did not perform a systematic search of the literature and we did not apply specific inclusion criteria based on study design or type of mental disorder.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Individuals with serious mental disorders and young adults with mental illness appear to form online relationships and connect with others on social media as often as social media users from the general population.

    “Studies have found that individuals with serious mental disorders (Spinzy, Nitzan, Becker, Bloch, & Fennig, 2012) as well as young adults with mental illness (Gowen, Deschaine, Gruttadara, & Markey, 2012) appear to form online relationships and connect with others on social media as often as social media users from the general population.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Spinzy, Nitzan, Becker, Bloch, & Fennig, 2012 source
    • cites Gowen, Deschaine, Gruttadara, & Markey, 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Individuals with mental disorders can experience passive social withdrawal, blunted affect, attentional impairment, and active social avoidance due to hallucinations or other concerns.

    “mental disorders can experience symptoms including passive social withdrawal, blunted affect and attentional impairment, as well as active social avoidance due to hallucinations or other concerns (Hansen, Torgalsbøen, Melle, & Bell, 2009)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hansen, Torgalsbøen, Melle, & Bell, 2009 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Among individuals with serious mental illness receiving community-based mental health services, rates of social media use are equivalent to the general population, exceeding 70% of participants.

    “among individuals with serious mental illness receiving community-based mental health services, a recent study found equivalent rates of social media use as the general population, even exceeding 70% of participants (Naslund, Aschbrenner, & Bartels, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naslund, Aschbrenner, & Bartels, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    For patients with bipolar disorder, the main interest in online self-help forums was to share emotions with others, allow exchange of information, and benefit by being part of an online social group.

    “Bauer et al. (2013) reported that the main interest in online self-help forums for patients with bipolar disorder was to share emotions with others, allow exchange of information, and benefit by being part of an online social group (Bauer, Bauer, Spiessl, & Kagerbauer, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bauer, Bauer, Spiessl, & Kagerbauer, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Initial studies from 2015 found that nearly half of a sample of psychiatric patients were social media users, with greater use among younger individuals.

    “Initial studies from 2015 found that nearly half of a sample of psychiatric patients were social media users, with greater use among younger individuals (Trefflich, Kalckreuth, Mergl, & Rummel-Kluge, 2015)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Trefflich, Kalckreuth, Mergl, & Rummel-Kluge, 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In an online psychosis peer-support group, different forms of support emerged: informational support about medication use or contacting mental health providers, esteem support involving positive comments for encouragement, network support for sharing similar experiences, and emotional support to express understanding and offer hope or confidence.

    “Specifically, different forms of support emerged, including ‘informational support’ about medication use or contacting mental health providers, ‘esteem support’ involving positive comments for encouragement, ‘network support’ for sharing similar experiences, and ‘emotional support’ to express understanding of a peer’s situation and offer hope or confidence (Chang, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chang, 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 2020, there are an estimated 3.8 billion social media users worldwide, representing half the global population.

    “In 2020, there are an estimated 3.8 billion social media users worldwide, representing half the global population (We Are Social, 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites We Are Social, 2020

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In online social networking among people with psychosis, an important purpose was to establish new friendships, pursue romantic relationships, maintain existing relationships or reconnect with people, and seek online peer support from others with lived experience.

    “More recently, in a review of online social networking in people with psychosis, Highton-Williamson et al (2015) highlight that an important purpose of such online connections was to establish new friendships, pursue romantic relationships, maintain existing relationships or reconnect with people, and seek online peer support from others with lived experience (Highton-Williamson et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Highton-Williamson et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Online interactions are more fluid and within the control of users, thereby overcoming possible social anxieties linked to in-person interaction.

    “with interactions being more fluid, and within the control of users, thereby overcoming possible social anxieties linked to in-person interaction (Indian & Grieve, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Indian & Grieve, 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent studies have reported negative effects of social media use on mental health of young people, including social comparison pressure with others and greater feeling of social isolation after being rejected by others on social media.

    “Recent studies have reported negative effects of social media use on mental health of young people, including social comparison pressure with others and greater feeling of social isolation after being rejected by others on social media (Rideout & Fox, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rideout & Fox, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the HORYZONS pilot study, the majority of participants (95%) engaged with the peer-to-peer networking feature, with many reporting increases in perceived social connectedness and empowerment in their recovery process.

    “Importantly, the majority of participants (95%) in this study engaged with the peer-to-peer networking feature of the program, with many reporting increases in perceived social connectedness and empowerment in their recovery process (Alvarez-Jimenez et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Alvarez-Jimenez et al., 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In the same review, reported negative effects were increased exposure to harm, social isolation, depressive symptoms, and bullying.

    “Yet, reported negative effects were an increased exposure to harm, social isolation, depressive symptoms and bullying (Best et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Best et al., 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a review of 43 studies in young people, many benefits of social media were cited, including increased self-esteem and opportunities for self-disclosure.

    “In a review of 43 studies in young people, many benefits of social media were cited, including increased self-esteem, and opportunities for self-disclosure (Best, Manktelow, & Taylor, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Best, Manktelow, & Taylor, 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is hard to estimate a number needed to treat or harm today given the nascent state of research.

    “It is hard to estimate a number needed to treat or harm today given the nascent state of research, which means the patient and clinician need to weigh the choice on a personal level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    This commentary only summarized published studies, so reports from the private sector or organizational websites were omitted.

    “Additionally, we only summarized published studies, and as a result, any reports from the private sector or websites from different organizations using social media or other apps containing social media-like features would have been omitted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Near ubiquitous social media use yields new opportunities to study the onset and manifestation of mental health symptoms and illness severity earlier than traditional clinical assessments.

    “As we consider future research directions, the near ubiquitous social media use also yields new opportunities to study the onset and manifestation of mental health symptoms and illness severity earlier than traditional clinical assessments.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Social media use is near ubiquitous.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    There is a dearth of research on the impact of social media on mental health in diverse settings and on how social media could support mental health services in lower income countries.

    “Despite the global reach of social media platforms, there is a dearth of research on the impact of these platforms on the mental health of individuals in diverse settings, as well as the ways in which social media could support mental health services in lower income countries where there is virtually no access to mental health providers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms have global reach.
    • Rests on an assumption: Lower income countries have virtually no access to mental health providers.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    This commentary did not conduct a systematic review of the literature.

    “Importantly, as we aimed to address this broad objective, we did not conduct a systematic review of the literature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Existing research looking at duration of exposure cannot account for the impact of specific types of content on mental health and is insufficient to fully understand the effects of using these platforms on mental health.

    “existing research looking at duration of exposure cannot account for the impact of specific types of content on mental health and is insufficient to fully understand the effects of using these platforms on mental health”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Studies reporting on the threats of social media for individuals with mental illness are mostly cross-sectional, making it difficult to draw conclusions about direction of causation.

    “Studies reporting on the threats of social media for individuals with mental illness are mostly cross-sectional, making it difficult to draw conclusions about direction of causation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a national survey of 14- to 22-year olds in the United States, female respondents were more likely to search online for information about depression or anxiety, and to try to connect with other people online who share similar mental health concerns, when compared to male respondents.

    “female respondents were more likely to search online for information about depression or anxiety, and to try to connect with other people online who share similar mental health concerns, when compared to male respondents (Rideout & Fox, 2018)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rideout & Fox, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    This commentary did not assess risk of bias in the summarized studies.

    “Another notable limitation is that we did not assess risk of bias in the studies summarized in this commentary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The studies reported in this commentary are not exhaustive, and additional relevant studies may not have been included.

    “Therefore, the studies reported here are not exhaustive, and there may be additional relevant studies that were not included.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There is growing emphasis on the need for greater integration of digital psychiatry into patient care and clinical services.

    “This aligns with growing emphasis on the need for greater integration of digital psychiatry, including apps, smartphones, or wearable devices, into patient care and clinical services through institution-wide initiatives and training clinical providers (Hilty, Chan, Torous, Luo, & Boland, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hilty, Chan, Torous, Luo, & Boland, 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Low-income and middle-income countries face a disproportionate share of the global burden of mental disorders and account for the majority of social media users worldwide.

    “especially as these countries face a disproportionate share of the global burden of mental disorders, yet account for the majority of social media users worldwide (Naslund et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Naslund et al., 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender individuals frequently use social media for searching for health information and may be more likely compared to heterosexual individuals to share their own personal health experiences with others online.

    “lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender individuals frequently use social media for searching for health information and may be more likely compared to heterosexual individuals to share their own personal health experiences with others online (Rideout & Fox, 2018)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rideout & Fox, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The wide reach, ease of access, and popularity of social media platforms could be used to allow individuals in need of mental health services or facing challenges of mental illness to access evidence-based treatment and support.

    “As the field of digital mental health advances, the wide reach, ease of access, and popularity of social media platforms could be used to allow individuals in need of mental health services or facing challenges of mental illness to access evidence-based treatment and support.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Social media platforms have global reach.
44 of 44
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social media platforms offer near continuous opportunities to connect and interact with others, regardless of time of day or geographic location.

    “Social media platforms offer near continuous opportunities to connect and interact with others, regardless of time of day or geographic location.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social media does not require the immediate responses necessary in face-to-face communication.

    “Because social media does not require the immediate responses necessary in face-to-face communication”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social media is widely used among individuals living with mental illness.

    “With the widespread use of social media among individuals living with mental illness combined with the potential to facilitate social interaction and connect with supportive peers, as summarized above, it may be possible to leverage the popular features of social media to enhance existing mental health programs and services.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effects of social media on psychiatric symptoms for individuals living with more severe mental illnesses have received less attention.

    “For individuals living with more severe mental illnesses, the effects of social media on psychiatric symptoms have received less attention.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Few studies have specifically explored the dangers of social media use from the perspectives of individuals living with mental illness.

    “While few studies have specifically explored the dangers of social media use from the perspectives of individuals living with mental illness”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Less is known about use of social media for seeking support for mental health concerns among gender minorities.

    “Less is known about use of social media for seeking support for mental health concerns among gender minorities”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The associations between social media use and mental health symptoms observed in the summarized studies reflect causal effects of social media use.

    “Studies reporting on the threats of social media for individuals with mental illness are mostly cross-sectional, making it difficult to draw conclusions about direction of causation.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social media use is near ubiquitous.

    “As we consider future research directions, the near ubiquitous social media use also yields new opportunities to study the onset and manifestation of mental health symptoms and illness severity earlier than traditional clinical assessments.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a gap in clinical knowledge about the impact of social media on mental health.

    “Given the gap in clinical knowledge about the impact of social media on mental health, clinicians should be aware of the many potential risks so that they can inform their patients, while remaining open to the possibility that their patients may also experience benefits through use of these platforms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Patients increasingly show interest in accessing mental health information or services through social media.

    “As patients increasingly show interest in accessing mental health information or services through social media, it will be necessary for health systems to recognize social media as a potential avenue for reaching or offering support to patients.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Social media platforms have global reach.

    “Despite the global reach of social media platforms, there is a dearth of research on the impact of these platforms on the mental health of individuals in diverse settings, as well as the ways in which social media could support mental health services in lower income countries where there is virtually no access to mental health providers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lower income countries have virtually no access to mental health providers.

    “Despite the global reach of social media platforms, there is a dearth of research on the impact of these platforms on the mental health of individuals in diverse settings, as well as the ways in which social media could support mental health services in lower income countries where there is virtually no access to mental health providers.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mental illness is a socially stigmatizing health condition.

    “For instance, data is typically captured from social media platforms without the consent or awareness of users (Bidargaddi et al., 2017), which is especially crucial when the data relates to a socially stigmatizing health condition such as mental illness (Guntuku, Yaden, Kern, Ungar, & Eichstaedt, 2017).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many individuals may feel embarrassed or reluctant to talk to their clinicians about using social media to find mental health information out of concerns of being judged or dismissed.

    “Alternatively, many individuals may feel embarrassed or reluctant to talk to their clinicians about using social media to find mental health information out of concerns of being judged or dismissed.”
14 of 14

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For teens with social anxiety, the ability to curate and control online interactions may reinforce avoidance behaviors, leading to greater isolation and increased stress during in-person exchanges.

    “For teens already experiencing social anxiety, the ability to curate and control online interactions may reinforce avoidance behaviors, leading to greater isolation and increased stress during in-person exchanges [46].”

    From The Impact of Social Media & Technology on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    The “Facilitate Social Interaction” section says online interactions can be more within users’ control and may overcome social anxieties linked to in-person interaction. The “Impact on Symptoms” section discusses possible loneliness when social media replaces face-to-face contact, but the paper does not say that control of online interactions reinforces avoidance in socially anxious teens or increases stress during in-person exchanges. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Online mental health communities provide peer encouragement, psychoeducation, and accessible coping strategies, offering support for individuals struggling with anxiety and depression.

    “Online mental health communities provide peer encouragement, psychoeducation, and accessible coping strategies, offering support for individuals struggling with anxiety and depression [46].”

    From The Impact of Social Media & Technology on Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    In “Access to a Peer Support Network” (page unavailable), the paper describes online encouragement, informational support, and sharing coping strategies among people with mental illness. It does not specifically establish that online communities provide psychoeducation or these forms of support to people struggling with anxiety and depression as a group. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social media shows benefits for offering mental health care.

    “Online help-seeking seems related to increased anonymity, accessibility, and inclusivity [31], and social media shows benefits for offering mental health care [32].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Lal citation does not match the reference-list author

    Minor

    The text cites Lal, Nguyen, and Theriault (2018), but the corresponding reference lists Lai as the first author.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naslund, J. A., Bondre, A., Torous, J., & Aschbrenner, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Naslund, John A.
Venue
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Published
2020-04-20
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
245-257
ISSN
2366-5963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3018892856
Cited by
746
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 166 · 2025: 201 · 2024: 149 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
60.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (U19MH113211, 1R01MH110965)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social media, mental health, peer support, mental illness, digital mental health interventions, evidence-based programs, mental disorder detection, prediction model, machine learning, data science, access to mental health care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review