CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 141Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsEducational Methods and Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A qualitative study into parental mediation of adolescents' internet use

Open access
Symons, Katrien, Ponnet, Koen, Walrave, Michel, Heirman, Wannes·2017·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Álvarez, 2013, Attitudes and parenting dimensions in parents' regulation of internet use by primary and secondary school children, Computers & Education, 67, 69, 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.005 · DOI
  2. Assadi, 2011, Beliefs about parental authority, parenting styles, and parent-adolescent conflict among Iranian mothers of middle adolescents, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 424, 10.1177/0165025411409121 · DOI
  3. Byrne, 2014, Peers, predators, and porn: Predicting parental underestimation of children's online risky experiences, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 215, 10.1111/jcc4.12040 · DOI
  4. Darling, 2007, Adolescents as active agents in the socialization process: Legitimacy of parental authority and obligation to obey as predictors of obedience, Journal of Adolescence, 30, 297, 10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.03.003 · DOI
  5. Dehue, 2008, Cyberbullying: Youngsters' experiences and parental perception, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 217, 10.1089/cpb.2007.0008 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Eastin, 2006, Parenting the internet, Journal of Communication, 56, 486, 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00297.x · DOI
  7. Heirman, 2016, Applying the theory of planned behavior to adolescents' acceptance of online friendship requests sent by strangers, Telematics and Informatics, 33, 1119, 10.1016/j.tele.2016.01.002 · DOI
  8. Hinduja, 2010, Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide, Archives of Suicide Research, 14, 206, 10.1080/13811118.2010.494133 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Katz, 2001, Adolescents and young adults with developmental disabilities interface with the internet: Six case reports of dangerous liaisons, Mental Health Aspects of Developmental Disabilities, 4, 77
  10. Kruse, 2008, Types of individuation in relation to parents: Predictors and outcomes, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 390, 10.1177/0165025408093657 · DOI
  11. Law, 2010, To control or not to control? Parenting behaviours and adolescent online aggression, Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1651, 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.013 · DOI
  12. Lee, 2012, Parental restrictive mediation of children's internet use: Effective for what and for whom?, New Media & Society, 15, 466, 10.1177/1461444812452412 · DOI
  13. Liau, 2005, Factors influencing adolescents' engagement in risky Internet behavior, Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 513, 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.513 · DOI
  14. Livingstone, 2008, Risky experiences for children online: Charting European research on children and the internet, Children & Society, 2, 314, 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00157.x · DOI
  15. Livingstone, 2014, Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies: The nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the digital age, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 635, 10.1111/jcpp.12197 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Matsunaga, 2009, Parents don't (always) know their children have been bullied: Child-parent discrepancy on bullying and family-level profile of communication standards, Human Communication Research, 35, 221, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01345.x · DOI
  17. McMillan, 2006, Coming of age with the internet: A qualitative exploration of how the internet has become an integral part of young people's lives, New Media & Society, 8, 73, 10.1177/1461444806059871 · DOI
  18. Mitchell, 2005, Protecting youth online: Family use of filtering and blocking software, Child Abuse & Neglect, 29, 753, 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.05.008 · DOI
  19. Padilla-Walker, 2011, “Turn that thing off!” parent and adolescent predictors of proactive media monitoring, Journal of Adolescence, 34, 705, 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.09.002 · DOI
  20. Rosen, 2008, The association of parenting style and child age with parental limit setting and adolescent MySpace behavior, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 459, 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.005 · DOI
  21. Shin, 2015, Parental socialization of children's internet use: A qualitative approach, New Media & Society, 17, 649, 10.1177/1461444813516833 · DOI
  22. Smetana, 2005, Adolescents' and parents' changing conceptions of parental authority, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 108, 31, 10.1002/cd.126 · DOI
  23. Smetana, 2006, Disclosure and secrecy in adolescent-parent relationships, Child Development, 77, 201, 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00865.x · DOI
  24. Sonck, 2013, Determinants of internet mediation, Journal of Children and Media, 7, 96, 10.1080/17482798.2012.739806 · DOI
  25. Sorbring, 2014, Parents' concerns about their teenage children's internet use, Journal of Family Issues, 35, 75, 10.1177/0192513X12467754 · DOI
  26. Valcke, 2010, Internet parenting styles and the impact on internet use of primary school children, Computers & Education, 55, 454, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009 · DOI
  27. Valkenburg, 2011, Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks, Journal of Adolescent Health, 48, 121, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Valkenburg, 2013, Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: A self-determination perspective, Human Communication Research, 39, 445, 10.1111/hcre.12010 · DOI
  29. Wang, 2005, Teenagers' internet use and family rules: A research note, Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1249, 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00214.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W.
Affiliations
University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Symons, Katrien
ORCID
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
73
Pages
423-432
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.004
OpenAlex
W2604231934
Cited by
141
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
36.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Fund of Odisee
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
Keywords
parental mediation, parent-adolescent communication, parental socialization, parental role, open communication, parental support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review