Cited by 73Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyDigital Media and Philosophy

Objective Facebook behaviour: Differences between problematic and non-problematic users

Open access
Marino, Claudia, Finos, Livio, Vieno, Alessio, Lenzi, Michela, Spada, Marcantonio M.·2017·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.015

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social media addiction has been found to be associated with a host of emotional, relational, health, and performance problems.

    “Social media addiction has been found to be associated with a host of emotional, relational, health, and performance problems (e.g., Echeburua & de Corral, 2010; Kuss & Griffiths, 2011; Marino, Finos, Vieno, Lenzi, & Spada, 2017; Marino, Gini, Vieno, & Spada, 2018).”

    From Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention (2019) · cites this paper as Marino, Finos, Vieno, Lenzi, & Spada, 2017

    Section 1.1 (page unavailable) describes problematic Facebook use as involving impairments in school, work, friendships, and romantic relationships, as well as distress and lower well-being. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports links with shame, depressive moods, and low life satisfaction. These passages support emotional, relational, and performance problems, but do not establish the broader claim about health problems beyond psychological well-being. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Balakrishnan, V., & Shamim, A. (2013). Malaysian Facebookers: Motives and addictive behaviours unraveled. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (4), 1342-1349.
  2. Beard, E., Dienes, Z., Muirhead, C., & West, R. (2016). Using Bayes factors for testing hypotheses about intervention effectiveness in addictions research. Addiction, 111 (12), 2230-2247.
  3. Casale, S., & Fioravanti, G. (2017). Shame experiences and problematic social networking sistes use: an unexplored association. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14 (1), 44-48.
  4. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook 'friends:' Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 12 (4), 1143-1168.
  5. Goodman, S. N. (1999). Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor. Annals of internal medicine, 130 (12), 1005-1013.
  6. Griffiths, M. D., Kuss, D. J., & Demetrovics, Z. (2014). Social networking addiction: An overview of preliminary findings. In K. P. Rosenberg & L. C. Feder (Eds.), Behavioral addictions: Criteria, evidence, and treatment (pp. 119-141). London, UK: Academic Press.
  7. Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability . Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  8. Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58 (1), 162-171.
  9. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Addiction to social networks on the Internet: A literature review of empirical research. International Journal of Environment and Public Health , 8, 3528 -3552.
  10. Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., Altoè, G., Scacchi, L., Perkins, D.D., Zukauskiene, R., & Santinello, M. (2015). Can Facebook Informational Use Foster Adolescent Civic Engagement? American Journal of Community Psychology, 55, 444 -454.
  11. Papacharissi, Z. & Mendelson, A. (2011). Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. In S. Papathanassopoulos (Ed.), Media perspectives for the 21st century (pp. 212 -230). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
  12. Pontes, H. M., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Clinical psychology of Internet addiction: a review of its conceptualization, prevalence, neuronal processes, and implications for treatment. Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, 4 , 11 -23.
  13. Rosen, L. D., Whaling, K., Rab, S., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Is Facebook creating 'iDisorders'? The link between clinical symptoms of psychiatric disorders and technology use, attitudes and anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 29 (3), 1243-1254.
  14. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 16 (2), 225-237.
  15. Schimmenti, A., & Caretti, V. (2017). Video-terminal dissociative trance: toward a psychodynamic understanding of problematic Internet use. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14 (1), 64-72.
  16. Sheldon, P. (2008). The relationship between unwillingness-tocommunicate and students' Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20, 67 -75.
  17. Spada, M. M., & Marino, C. (2017). Metacognitions and emotion regulation as predictors of problematic Internet use in adolescents. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14 (1), 59-63.
  18. Sirota, M., Juanchich, M., Kostopoulou, O., & Hanak, R. (2014). Decisive Evidence on a SmallerThan-YouThink Phenomenon Revisiting the '1 -inX' Effect on Subjective Medical Probabilities. Medical Decision Making, 34 (4), 419-429.
  19. Tang, J. H., Chen, M. C., Yang, C. Y., Chung, T. Y., & Lee, Y. A. (2016). Personality traits, interpersonal relationships, online social support, and Facebook addiction. Telematics and Informatics, 33 (1), 102-108.
  20. Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9 (5), 584-590.
  21. van Rooij, T., Ferguson, C. J., Van de Mheen, D., & Schoenmakers, T. M. (2017). Time to abandon Internet Addiction? Predicting problematic internet, game, and social media use from psychosocial well-being and application use. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14 (1), 113-121.
  22. Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (3), 426 -432.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marino, C., Finos, L., Vieno, A., Lenzi, M., & Spada, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • London South Bank University (GB)
Corresponding author
Marino, Claudia
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
73
Pages
541-546
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2605805207
Cited by
73
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3
FWCI
18.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Research Open (London South Bank University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Open (London South Bank University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
problematic Facebook use, Facebook, social media addiction, event attendance, private messaging, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review