Cited by 99Health, Technology, Consumer BehaviorConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceDigital Marketing and Social Media

Effects of social popularity and time scarcity on online consumer behaviour regarding smart healthcare products: An eye-tracking approach

Mou, Jian, Shin, Donghee·2018·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.049

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mou, J., & Shin, D.
Affiliations
  • Xidian University (CN)
  • Chung-Ang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Shin, Donghee
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
78
Pages
74-89
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2754062402
Cited by
99
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds (20103176477)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
Keywords
social popularity, time constraints, online consumer behaviour, consumer trust, perceived product quality, perceived value, visual attention, fixation patterns, signaling theory, e-commerce

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review