Cited by 303Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Privacy concerns and benefits of engagement with social media-enabled apps: A privacy calculus perspective

Open access
Jozani, Mohsen, Ayaburi, Emmanuel, Ko, Myung, Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond·2020·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106260

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The subjective nature of privacy issues, the widespread expansion of online platforms, multi-party participation, the nature of data disclosure, and associated ethics make determining the contradictory effects between personal privacy issues and behavior challenging.

    “The subjective nature of privacy issues, the widespread expansion of online platforms, multi-party participation, the nature of data disclosure, and associated ethics make determining the contradictory effects between personal privacy issues and behavior challenging [106,107].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 102 · Cited by 303

Authors
Jozani, M., Ayaburi, E., Ko, M., & Choo, K.-K. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
  • The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
Corresponding author
Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
107
Pages
106260
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003129027
Cited by
303
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 8
FWCI
44.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
privacy calculus, user engagement, mobile application

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review