CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 652Public Relations and Crisis CommunicationCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactE-Government and Public Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unpacking the black box: How to promote citizen engagement through government social media during the COVID-19 crisis

Open access
Chen, Qiang, Min, Chen, Zhang, Wei, Wang, Ge, Ma, Xiaoyue, Evans, Richard·2020·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380PMC PMC7151317
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

During times of public crises, governments must act swiftly to communicate crisis information effectively and efficiently to members of the public; failure to do so will inevitably lead citizens to become fearful, uncertain and anxious in the prevailing conditions. This pioneering study systematically investigates how Chinese central government agencies used social media to promote citizen engagement during the COVID-19 crisis. Using data scraped from 'Healthy China', an official Sina Weibo account of the National Health Commission of China, we examine how citizen engagement relates to a series of theoretically relevant factors, including media richness, dialogic loop, content type and emotional valence. Results show that media richness negatively predicts citizen engagement through government social media, but dialogic loop facilitates engagement. Information relating to the latest news about the crisis and the government's handling of the event positively affects citizen engagement through government social media. Importantly, all relationships were contingent upon the emotional valence of each Weibo post.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Haro-de-Rosario, 2018, 20, 29

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 651

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Q., Min, C., Zhang, W., Wang, G., Ma, X., & Evans, R.
Affiliations
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Central China Normal University (CN)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Wei
ORCID
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
110
Pages
106380
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380
PMC
PMC7151317
OpenAlex
W3015216621
Cited by
652
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 164 · 2020: 48
FWCI
139.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Social Science Foundation of China (17CXW026)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
Keywords
citizen participation, government social media, COVID-19 pandemic, crisis communication, Weibo, media richness, content types, emotional valence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review