CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 70

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Loving a “defiant” AI companion? The gender performance and ethics of social exchange robots in simulated intimate interactions

Leo-Liu, Jindong·2023·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107620
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107620

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Banks, 2020, Toward an agent-agnostic transmission model: Synthesizing anthropocentric and technocentric paradigms in communication, Human-Machine Communication, 1, 19, 10.30658/hmc.1.2 · DOI
  2. Butler, 1988, Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory, Theatre Journal, 40, 519, 10.2307/3207893 · DOI
  3. Can, 2016, Are sex robots as bad as killing robots?, What social robots can and should do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR, 290, 27
  4. Dehnert, 2022, Sex with robots and human-machine sexualities: Encounters between human-machine communication and sexuality studies, Human-Machine Communication, 4, 131, 10.30658/hmc.4.7 · DOI
  5. Dubé, 2022, Sex robots and personality: It is more about sex than robots, Computers in Human Behavior, 136, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107403 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Edwards, 2019, Initial expectations, interactions, and beyond with social robots, Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 308, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.042 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fortunati, 2022, Framing the psycho-social and cultural aspects of human-machine communication, Human-Machine Communication, 4, 7, 10.30658/hmc.4.1 · DOI
  8. Garfinkel, 1974, The origins of the term ‘ethnomethodology, Ethnomethodology, 15, 18
  9. Gatebox, 2022, Come to see you from another dimension
  10. González-González, 2019, Sex with robots: Analyzing the gender and ethics approaches in design, Proceedings of the XX International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 1
  11. He, 2004, CA for SLA: Arguments from the Chinese language classroom, The Modern Language Journal, 88, 568, 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-19-.x · DOI
  12. Hepp, 2020, Artificial companions, social bots and work bots: Communicative robots as research objects of media and communication studies, Media, Culture & Society, 42, 1410, 10.1177/0163443720916412 · DOI
  13. Jung, 2004, Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots, Proceedings of PRESENCE, 80
  14. Krasmann, 2020, The logic of the surface: On the epistemology of algorithms in times of big data, Information, Communication & Society, 23, 2096, 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1726986 · DOI
  15. Lamerichs, 2019, Character of the future: Machine learning, data, and personality, Image: Journal of Interdisciplinary Image Science, 29, 98
  16. Leo-Liu, 2022, A “soul” emerges when AI, AR, and Anime converge: A case study on users of the new anime-stylized hologram social robot “Hupo, New Media & Society, 14614448221106030
  17. Lin, 2018, 发布 「有生命的智能音箱」HE 琥珀，狗尾草开启 AI 消费产品的下半场, Shenzhen Ware
  18. Liu, 2021, Social Robots as the bride?: Understanding the construction of gender in a Japanese social robot product, Human-Machine Communication, 2, 105, 10.30658/hmc.2.5 · DOI
  19. Neff, 2016, Talking to bots: Symbiotic agency and the case of tay, International Journal of Communication, 10, 4915
  20. Reeves, 1996, The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people, 10
  21. Richardson, 2016, The asymmetrical 'relationship' parallels between prostitution and the development of sex robots, ACM SIGCAS - Computers and Society, 45, 290, 10.1145/2874239.2874281 · DOI
  22. Richardson, 2016, Sex robot matters: Slavery, the prostituted, and the rights of machines, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 35, 46, 10.1109/MTS.2016.2554421 · DOI
  23. Richardson, 2016, Technological animism: The uncanny personhood of humanoid machines, Social Analysis, 60, 110, 10.3167/sa.2016.600108 · DOI
  24. Rollet, 2020, Talk to you later”: Doing social robotics with conversation analysis. Towards the development of an automatic system for the prediction of disengagement, Interaction Studies, 21, 268, 10.1075/is.19001.roll · DOI
  25. Seibt, 2020, Sociomorphing, not anthropomorphizing: Towards a typology of experienced sociality, Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics--Proceedings of Robophilosophy, 51
  26. Sundar, 2022, Rethinking communication in the era of artificial intelligence, Human Communication Research, 48, 379, 10.1093/hcr/hqac014 · DOI
  27. White, 2019, Japan's emerging emotional tech, Anthropology News, 60, e41, 10.1111/AN.1070 · DOI
  28. Wilde, 2019, Recontextualizing characters. Media convergence and pre-/meta-narrative character circulation, IMAGE. Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre Bildwissenschaft, 15, 3
  29. Wu, 2004, Stance in talk, Stance in Talk, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 70

Metadata

Authors
Leo-Liu, J.
ORCID
Leo-Liu, Jindong
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
141
Pages
107620
ISSN
0747-5632
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2022.107620
Cited by
70
References
6
Language
en
Licence
Funders
The Chinese University of Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review