CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 150

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How does anthropomorphism improve human-AI interaction satisfaction: a dual-path model

Xie, Yuguang, Zhu, Keyu, Zhou, Peiyu, Liang, Changyong·2023·Computers in Human Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107878
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107878

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Airenti, 2015, The cognitive bases of anthropomorphism: From relatedness to empathy, International Journal of Social Robotics, 7, 117, 10.1007/s12369-014-0263-x · DOI
  2. Ashfaq, 2020, I, Chatbot: Modeling the determinants of users' satisfaction and continuance intention of AI-powered service agents, Telematics and Informatics, 54, 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101473 · DOI
  3. Balapour, 2020, Mobile application security: Role of perceived privacy as the predictor of security perceptions, International Journal of Information Management, 52, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102063 · DOI
  4. Benlian, 2020, Mitigating the intrusive effects of smart home assistants by using anthropomorphic design features: A multimethod investigation, Information Systems Journal, 30, 1010, 10.1111/isj.12243 · DOI
  5. Blut, 2021, Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49, 632, 10.1007/s11747-020-00762-y · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cheng, 2021, Exploring consumers' response to text-based chatbots in e-commerce: The moderating role of task complexity and chatbot disclosure, Internet Research
  7. Cheng, 2020, How do AI-driven chatbots impact user experience? Examining gratifications, perceived privacy risk, satisfaction, loyalty, and continued use, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64, 592, 10.1080/08838151.2020.1834296 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chen, 2020, Factors influencing college students' mental health promotion: The mediating effect of online mental health information seeking, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 4783, 10.3390/ijerph17134783 · DOI
  9. Chérif, 2019, Anthropomorphic virtual assistants and the reactions of Internet users: An experiment on the assistant's voice, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 34, 28, 10.1177/2051570719829432 · DOI
  10. Chiang, 2022, Emotion and service quality of anthropomorphic robots, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 177, 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121550 · DOI
  11. Chuah, 2021, Unveiling the complexity of consumers' intention to use service robots: An fsQCA approach, Computers in Human Behavior, 123, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106870 · DOI
  12. Damiano, 2018, Anthropomorphism in human–robot co-evolution, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 468, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00468 · DOI
  13. Delgosha, 2021, How human users engage with consumer robots? A dual model of psychological ownership and trust to explain post-adoption behaviours, Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106660 · DOI
  14. Edwards, 2014, Is that a bot running the social media feed? Testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on twitter, Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 372, 10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.013 · DOI
  15. Edwards, 2019, Evaluations of an artificial intelligence instructor's voice: Social Identity Theory in human-robot interactions, Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 357, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.027 · DOI
  16. Fernandes, 2021, Understanding consumers' acceptance of automated technologies in service encounters: Drivers of digital voice assistants adoption, Journal of Business Research, 122, 180, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.058 · DOI
  17. Gursoy, 2019, Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery, International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hirschman, 1982, Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions, Journal of Marketing, 46, 92, 10.1177/002224298204600314 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Huaman‐Ramirez, 2022, How brand self‐disclosure helps brands create intimacy with customers: The role of information valence and anthropomorphism, Psychology and Marketing, 39, 460, 10.1002/mar.21609 · DOI
  20. Hu, 1999, Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1, 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Isbister, 2000, Consistency of personality in interactive characters: Verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 251, 10.1006/ijhc.2000.0368 · DOI
  22. Jones, 2006, Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes, Journal of Business Research, 59, 974, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.006 · DOI
  23. Kim, 2019, Effects of gender and relationship type on the response to artificial intelligence, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22, 249, 10.1089/cyber.2018.0581 · DOI
  24. Kim, 2019, Willingness to provide personal information: Perspective of privacy calculus in IoT services, Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 273, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.022 · DOI
  25. Klüber, 2021, Appearance is not everything - preferred feature combinations for care robots, Computers in Human Behavior
  26. Konya-Baumbach, 2022, Someone out there? A study on the social presence of anthropomorphized chatbots, Computers in Human Behavior
  27. Kopp, 2021, How linguistic framing affects factory workers' initial trust in collaborative robots: The interplay between anthropomorphism and technological replacement, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  28. Lee, 2021, The continuation and recommendation intention of artificial intelligence-based voice assistant systems (AIVAS): The influence of personal traits, Internet Research, 31, 1899, 10.1108/INTR-06-2020-0327 · DOI
  29. Li, 2020, Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory, Technology in Society, 63, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410 · DOI
  30. Li, 2021, Anthropomorphism brings us closer: The mediating role of psychological distance in User–AI assistant interactions, Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106680 · DOI
  31. Li, 2022, The effects of anthropomorphism, message framing, and voice type on unhealthy sleep behavior in young users: The mediating role of risk perception, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 10.3390/ijerph19159570 · DOI
  32. Malhotra, 2004, Internet users' information privacy concerns (IUIPC): The construct, the scale, and a causal model, Information Systems Research, 15, 336, 10.1287/isre.1040.0032 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Mishra, 2021, Psychological determinants of users' adoption and word-of-mouth recommendations of smart voice assistants, International Journal of Information Management
  34. Mori, 1970, The uncanny valley, Energy, 7, 33
  35. Mori, 2012, The uncanny valley [from the field], IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 19, 98, 10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Moussawi, 2021, The effect of voice and humour on users' perceptions of personal intelligent agents, Behaviour & Information Technology, 40, 1603, 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1772368 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Moussawi, 2022, The role of user perceptions of intelligence, anthropomorphism, and self-extension on continuance of use of personal intelligent agents, European Journal of Information Systems, 1
  38. Munnukka, 2022, Anthropomorphism and social presence in Human–Virtual service assistant interactions: The role of dialog length and attitudes, Computers in Human Behavior, 135, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107343 · DOI
  39. Niculescu, 2013, Making social robots more attractive: The effects of voice pitch, humor and empathy, International Journal of Social Robotics, 5, 171, 10.1007/s12369-012-0171-x · DOI
  40. Pelau, 2021, What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry, Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106855 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Peng, 2019, Moderating effects of time pressure on the relationship between perceived value and purchase intention in social E-commerce sales promotion: Considering the impact of product involvement, Information & Management, 56, 317, 10.1016/j.im.2018.11.007 · DOI
  42. Reeves, 1996, The media equation: How people treat computers, television, Vol. 10
  43. Schanke, 2021, Estimating the impact of “humanizing” customer service chatbots, Information Systems Research, 10.1287/isre.2021.1015 · DOI
  44. Seo, 2022, When female (male) robot is talking to me: Effect of service robots' gender and anthropomorphism on customer satisfaction, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103166 · DOI
  45. Söderlund, 2020, Employee encouragement of self-disclosure in the service encounter and its impact on customer satisfaction, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102001 · DOI
  46. Song, 2022, Can people experience romantic love for artificial intelligence? An empirical study of intelligent assistants, Information & Management, 59, 10.1016/j.im.2022.103595 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Sung, 2021, Consumer engagement via interactive artificial intelligence and mixed reality, International Journal of Information Management, 60, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102382 · DOI
  48. Takeuchi, 2008, When does decision autonomy increase expatriate managers' adjustment? An empirical test, Academy of Management Journal, 51, 45, 10.5465/amj.2008.30696751 · DOI
  49. Tay, 2016, Types of humor that robots can play, Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 19, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.042 · DOI
  50. Wang, 2020, Privacy calculus or heuristic cues? The dual process of privacy decision making on Chinese social media, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33, 353, 10.1108/JEIM-05-2019-0121 · DOI
  51. Xie, 2022, The nonlinear effect of service robot anthropomorphism on customers' usage intention: A privacy calculus perspective, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 107, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103312 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Xu, 2020, Moral obligation in online social interaction: Clicking the “like” button, Information & Management, 57, 10.1016/j.im.2019.103249 · DOI
  53. Yam, 2021, Reducing the uncanny valley by dehumanizing humanoid robots, Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106945 · DOI
  54. Yuan, 2019, Acting like humans? Anthropomorphism and consumer's willingness to pay in electronic commerce, Journal of Management Information Systems, 36, 450, 10.1080/07421222.2019.1598691 · DOI
  55. Zhang, 2021, Impact of anthropomorphic features of artificially intelligent service robots on consumer acceptance: Moderating role of sense of humor, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33, 3883, 10.1108/IJCHM-11-2020-1256 · DOI
  56. Zhang, 2020, The effect of brand anthropomorphism, brand distinctiveness, and warmth on brand attitude: A mediated moderation model, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19, 523, 10.1002/cb.1835 · DOI
  57. Zhang, 2023, Tools or peers? Impacts of anthropomorphism level and social role on emotional attachment and disclosure tendency towards intelligent agents, Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107415 · DOI
  58. Zhu, 2022, It is me, chatbot: Working to address the COVID-19 outbreak-related mental health issues in China. User experience, satisfaction, and influencing factors, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38, 1182, 10.1080/10447318.2021.1988236 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 150

Metadata

Authors
Xie, Y., Zhu, K., Zhou, P., & Liang, C.
ORCID
Xie, Yuguang
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
148
Pages
107878
ISSN
0747-5632
DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2023.107878
Cited by
150
References
16
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (72131006)
  • National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
  • Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences (21AZD116)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review