Cited by 394AI in Service InteractionsDigital Marketing and Social MediaSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

How chatbots' social presence communication enhances consumer engagement: the mediating role of parasocial interaction and dialogue

Tsai, Wan-Hsiu Sunny, Liu, Yu, Chuan, Ching-Hua·2021·Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing

Abstract

Purpose: This study presents one of the earliest empirical investigations on how brand chatbots' anthropomorphic design and social presence communication strategies may improve consumer evaluation outcomes via the mediators of parasocial interaction and perceived dialogue. Design/methodology/approach: This study employs a 2 (high vs. low social presence communication) by 2 (anthropomorphic vs. non-anthropomorphic bot profile) between-subject experimental design to evaluate how chatbots' high social presence communication and anthropomorphic profile design may enhance perceptions of parasocial interactions and dialogue with the chatbot, which in turn drive user engagement, interaction satisfaction and attitude toward the represented brand. Findings: The influences of chatbots' high social presence communication on consumer engagement outcomes are mediated by perceived parasocial interaction and dialogue. Additionally, chatbots' anthropomorphic profile design can boost the positive effects of social presence communication via the psychological mediators. Originality/value: This study advances the interactive marketing literature by focusing on an emerging interactive technology, chatbots. Additionally, distinct from prior chatbot studies that focused on the utilitarian use of chatbots for online customer support, this study not only examines which factors of chatbot communication and profile design may drive chatbot effectiveness but also examines the mechanism underlying the messaging and design effects on consumer engagement. The findings highlight the mediating role of interpersonal factors of parasocial interaction and perceived dialogue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jrim-12-2019-0200

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, W.-H. S., Liu, Y., & Chuan, C.-H.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Florida International University (US)
Venue
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-06-18
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
460-482
ISSN
2040-7122 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3174303984
Cited by
394
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 6
FWCI
18.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
chatbots, anthropomorphic design, parasocial interaction, customer engagement, interaction satisfaction, brand attitude, interactive marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review