Cited by 73Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and Analytics

Human-in-the-loop in artificial intelligence in education: A review and entity-relationship (ER) analysis

Open access
Memarian, Bahar, Doleck, Tenzin·2024·Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans

Abstract

Human-in-the-loop research predominantly examines the interaction types and effects. A more structural and pragmatic exploration of humans and Artificial Intelligence or AI is lacking in the artificial intelligence in educational literature. In this systematic review we follow the Entity-Relationship (ER) framework to identify trends in the entities, relationships, and attributes of human-in-the-loop AI in education. An overview of N = 28 reviewed studies followed by their ER characteristics are summarized and analyzed. The dominant number of two or three-entity studies, one-sided relationships, little attributes, and many to many cardinalities may signal a lack of deliberation on beings that come to interact and influence human-in-the-loop and AI in education. The contribution of this work is identifying the implications of human-in-the-loop and AI from a more formal ER perspective and acknowledging the many possibilities for placement of humans in the loop with the AI, system, and environment of interest.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100053

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI Agents are typically designed as single-entity systems that perform goal-directed tasks by utilizing external tools, applying sequential reasoning, and integrating real-time information to complete well-defined functions.

    “AI Agents are typically designed as single-entity systems that perform goal-directed tasks by utilizing external tools, applying sequential reasoning, and integrating real-time information to complete well-defined functions [25,43].”
  • AI Agents are typically single-entity systems that perform goal-directed tasks using external tools, sequential reasoning, and real-time information.

    “AI Agents are typically designed as single-entity systems that perform goal-directed tasks by utilizing external tools, applying sequential reasoning, and integrating real-time information to complete well-defined functions [24], [45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Memarian, Bahar
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
100053
ISSN
2949-8821 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391723017
Cited by
73
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 2
FWCI
27.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Simon Fraser University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
human-in-the-loop, artificial intelligence in education, human-AI interaction, entity-relationship model, human-AI systems, interaction types, interaction effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review