The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring uses and gratifications and psychological outcomes of engagement with Instagram Stories
Abstract
The current research examines why and how Generation Z and Millennials engage with Instagram Stories and how user engagement is associated with emotions and psychological dependency. The two-step approach reveals a new configuration of gratifications for using Instagram Stories: exploration, self-enhancement, perceived functionality, entertainment, social sharing, relationship building, novelty, and surveillance. Users are likely to engage in content consumption for entertainment, exploration, and perceived functionality; in contribution activities for relationship building and social sharing; and in content creation for meeting needs pertaining to relationship building, self-enhancement, social sharing, and novelty. The findings highlight that contribution and creation activities are likely to result in positive emotions, while creation alone predicts negative emotions. Although users are more likely to experience positive than negative emotions when engaging with Instagram Stories, the effect of engagement on psychological dependency is greater through increased negative emotions. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Uses and Gratifications Research
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/268109 · Cited by 4,012
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008
Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions
van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510375599 · Cited by 3,536
Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk
Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6 · Cited by 3,172
Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., & Wang, E. T. G. (2006) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001 · Cited by 3,170
Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience
Richins, M. L. (1997) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209499 · Cited by 2,055
The Impact of Social Media on Children, Adolescents, and Families
O'Keeffe, G. S., Clarke-Pearson, K., & Council on Communications and Media (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-0054 · Cited by 1,987
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. M. (2000) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2 · Cited by 1,826
Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach
Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013) · Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-06-2013-0041 · Cited by 1,810
Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y · Cited by 1,618
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Lorenz, 2019, The Instagram Aesthetic Is Over: The look made famous by the platform just doesn't resonate anymore, The Atlantic
- Macmillan, 2017, Why Instagram Is the Worst Social Media for Mental Health, Time
- Wells, 2021, Facebook knows Instagram is toxic for teen girls, company documents show, The Wall Street Journal
Cited by
Balaban, D. C., Mucundorfeanu, M., & Naderer, B. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2024.2413916 · Cited by 11
“Thus, they find it helpful to follow SMIs to obtain benefits such as getting information about products, keeping up with current trends (Lu and Lin 2022), and having access to discount codes (Coco and Eckert 2020).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, J.-D. (., & Lin, J.-S. (.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 100198
- ISSN
- 2451-9588
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 92
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor)
- Funders
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (108-2410-H-004 -183 -MY2)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
