Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comparative Lipidomics Platform for Chemotaxonomic Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Open access
Layre, Emilie, Sweet, Lindsay, Hong, Sunhee, Madigan, Cressida A., Desjardins, Danielle, Young, David C., Cheng, Tan-Yun, Annand, John W., Kim, Keunpyo, Shamputa, Isdore C., McConnell, Matthew J., Debono, C. Anthony, Behar, Samuel M., Minnaard, Adriaan J., Murray, Megan, Barry, Clifton E., Matsunaga, Isamu, Moody, D. Branch·2011·Chemistry & Biology
DOI 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.10.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Summary The lipidic envelope of Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes virulence in many ways, so we developed a lipidomics platform for broad survey of cell walls. Here we report two new databases (MycoMass, MycoMap), 30 lipid fine maps and mass spectrometry datasets that comprise a static lipidome. Further, by rapidly regenerating lipidomic datasets during biological processes, comparative lipidomics provides statistically valid, organism-wide comparisons that broadly assess lipid changes during infection or among clinical strains of mycobacteria. Using stringent data filters, we tracked more than 5,000 molecular features in parallel with few or no false positive molecular discoveries. The low error rates allowed the first chemotaxonomic analyses of mycobacteria, which describe the extent of chemical change in each strain and identified particular strain-specific molecules for use as biomarkers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.10.013

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 205

Metadata

Authors
Layre, E., Sweet, L., Hong, S., Madigan, C. A., Desjardins, D., Young, D. C., Cheng, T.-Y., Annand, J. W., Kim, K., Shamputa, I. C., McConnell, M. J., Debono, C. A., Behar, S. M., Minnaard, A. J., Murray, M., Barry, C. E., Matsunaga, I., & Moody, D. B.
Venue
Chemistry & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
18
Issue
12
Pages
1537-1549
ISSN
1074-5521 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.10.013
OpenAlex
W2045408415
Cited by
205
References
5
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Lipidomics Platform for Chemotaxonomic Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.10.013
The paper
Layre, E., Sweet, L., Hong, S., Madigan, C. A., Desjardins, D., Young, D. C., Cheng, T.-Y., Annand, J. W., Kim, K., Shamputa, I. C., McConnell, M. J., Debono, C. A., Behar, S. M., Minnaard, A. J., Murray, M., Barry, C. E., Matsunaga, I., & Moody, D. B. (2011). A Comparative Lipidomics Platform for Chemotaxonomic Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Chemistry & Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.10.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.