The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural Biology and Drug Discovery of Difficult Targets: The Limits of Ligandability
Open accessAbstract
Over the past decade, researchers in the pharmaceutical industry and academia have made retrospective analyses of successful drug campaigns in order to establish "rules" to guide the selection of new target proteins. They have identified features that are considered undesirable and some that make targets "unligandable." This review focuses on the factors that make targets difficult: featureless binding sites, the lack of hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors, the presence of metal ions, the need for adaptive changes in conformation, and the lipophilicity of residues at the protein-ligand interface. Protein-protein interfaces of multiprotein assemblies share many of these undesirable features, although those that involve concerted binding and folding in their assembly have better defined pockets or grooves, and these can provide opportunities for identifying hits and for lead optimization. In some protein-protein interfaces conformational changes-often involving rearrangement of large side chains such as those of tyrosine, tryptophan, or arginine-are required to configure an appropriate binding site, and this may require tethering of the ligands until higher affinity is achieved. In many enzymes, larger conformational rearrangements are required to form the binding site, and these can make fragment-based approaches particularly difficult.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“not all members of a protein family have drug-compatible or ligandable21 binding sites”
From Unexplored therapeutic opportunities in the human genome (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
An inhibitor of Bcl-2 family proteins induces regression of solid tumours
Oltersdorf, T., Elmore, S. W., Shoemaker, A. R., Armstrong, R. C., Augeri, D. J., Belli, B., Bruncko, M., Deckwerth, T. L., Dinges, J., Hajduk, P. J., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03579 · Cited by 3,407
Hopkins, A. L., & Groom, C. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd892 · Cited by 3,305
Discovering High-Affinity Ligands for Proteins: SAR by NMR
Shuker, S. B., Hajduk, P. J., Meadows, R. P., & Fesik, S. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5292.1531 · Cited by 2,045
Reaching for high-hanging fruit in drug discovery at protein–protein interfaces
Wells, J. A., & McClendon, C. L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06526 · Cited by 2,002
Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces
Bogan, A. A., & Thorn, K. S. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1843 · Cited by 1,988
A Hot Spot of Binding Energy in a Hormone-Receptor Interface
Clackson, T., & Wells, J. A. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7529940 · Cited by 1,987
Structural Mechanism for STI-571 Inhibition of Abelson Tyrosine Kinase
Schindler, T. H., Bornmann, W. G., Pellicena, P., Miller, W. T., Clarkson, B., & Kuriyan, J. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5486.1938 · Cited by 1,785
Fpocket: An open source platform for ligand pocket detection
Guilloux, V. L., Schmidtke, P., & Tufféry, P. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-168 · Cited by 1,724
X-ray and NMR structure of human Bcl-xL, an inhibitor of programmed cell death
Muchmore, S. W., Sattler, M., Liang, H., Meadows, R. P., Harlan, J. E., Yoon, H. S., Nettesheim, D. G., Chang, B. S., Thompson, C. B., Wong, S., et al. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381335a0 · Cited by 1,467
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of Molecular Dynamics and Related Methods in Drug Discovery
Vivo, M. D., Masetti, M., Bottegoni, G., & Cavalli, A. (2016) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01684 · Cited by 1,358
Oral Druggable Space beyond the Rule of 5: Insights from Drugs and Clinical Candidates
Doak, B. C., Over, B., Giordanetto, F., & Kihlberg, J. (2014) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.013 · Cited by 835
Inhibition of α-helix-mediated protein–protein interactions using designed molecules
Azzarito, V., Long, K., Murphy, N. S., & Wilson, A. J. (2013) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1568 · Cited by 727
Discovery of small molecule cancer drugs: Successes, challenges and opportunities
Hoelder, S., Clarke, P. A., & Workman, P. (2012) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2012.02.004 · Cited by 591
Macrocyclic Drugs and Clinical Candidates: What Can Medicinal Chemists Learn from Their Properties?
Giordanetto, F., & Kihlberg, J. O. (2013) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm400887j · Cited by 577
Metadata
- Authors
- Surade, S., & Blundell, T. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Blundell, Tom L.
- Venue
- Chemistry & Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 42-50
- ISSN
- 1074-5521 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084501039
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Chemistry & Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- University of Pittsburgh
- Wellcome Trust
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- ligandability, target selection, protein binding sites, hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, protein conformational change, protein-protein interfaces, fragment-based drug discovery, lead optimization
- MeSH terms
- Binding Sites, Ligands, Proteins, Catalytic Domain, BRCA2 Protein, Protein Interaction Mapping, Rad51 Recombinase, Drug Discovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
