Cited by 31Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Targeted degradation of PCNA outperforms stoichiometric inhibition to result in programed cell death

Open access
Chang, Shih Chieh, Gopal, Pooja, Lim, Shuhui, Wei, Xiaona, Chandramohan, Arun, Mangadu, Ruban, Smith, Jeffrey, Ng, Simon +4 more·2022·Cell Chemical Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Biodegraders are targeted protein degradation constructs composed of mini-proteins/peptides linked to E3 ligase receptors. We gained deeper insights into their utility by studying Con1-SPOP, a biodegrader against proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), an oncology target. Con1-SPOP proved pharmacologically superior to its stoichiometric (non-degrading) inhibitor equivalent (Con1-SPOPmut) as it had more potent anti-proliferative effects and uniquely induced DNA damage, cell apoptosis, and necrosis. Proteomics showed that PCNA degradation gave impaired mitotic division and mitochondria dysfunction, effects not seen with the stoichiometric inhibitor. We further showed that doxycycline-induced Con1-SPOP achieved complete tumor growth inhibition in vivo. Intracellular delivery of mRNA encoding Con1-SPOP via lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) depleted endogenous PCNA within hours of application with nanomolar potency. Our results demonstrate the utility of biodegraders as biological tools and highlight target degradation as a more efficacious approach versus stoichiometric inhibition. Once in vivo delivery is optimized, biodegraders may be leveraged as an exciting therapeutic modality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chembiol.2022.10.005

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chang, S. C., Gopal, P., Lim, S., Wei, X., Chandramohan, A., Mangadu, R., Smith, J., Ng, S., Gindy, M., Phan, U., Henry, B., & Partridge, A. W.
Affiliations
  • MSD (Singapore) (SG)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Partridge, Anthony William
Venue
Cell Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
1601-1615.e7
ISSN
  • 2451-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 2451-9456
OpenAlex
W4307905483
Cited by
31
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell chemical biology (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
targeted protein degradation, PCNA, SPOP, E3 ubiquitin ligase, DNA damage, apoptosis, necrosis, mitotic division, mitochondrial dysfunction, tumor growth inhibition, mRNA delivery, lipid nanoparticles, doxycycline induction, antiproliferative activity
MeSH terms
Liposomes, Apoptosis, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review