Cited by 11Groundwater and Isotope GeochemistryWater Quality and Resources StudiesGroundwater flow and contamination studies

Measurements of HFC-134a and HCFC-22 in groundwater and unsaturated-zone air: Implications for HFCs and HCFCs as dating tracers

Haase, Karl B., Busenberg, Eurybiades, Plummer, L. Niel, Casile, Gerolamo, Sanford, Ward E.·2014·Chemical Geology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.07.016

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haase, K. B., Busenberg, E., Plummer, L. N., Casile, G., & Sanford, W. E.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Haase, Karl B.
Venue
Chemical Geology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
385
Pages
117-128
ISSN
0009-2541 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993991641
Cited by
11
References
74
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Geology (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Keywords
R134a, R22, hydrochlorofluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, methanotrophic bacteria, greenhouse gas sinks, chlorofluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review