CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 446

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of various advanced oxidation processes and chemical treatment methods for COD and color removal from a polyester and acetate fiber dyeing effluent

Azbar, N., Yonar, T., Kestioglu, K.·2004·Chemosphere
DOI 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.046
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper, a comparison of various advanced oxidation processes (O3, O3/UV, H2O2/UV, O3/H2O2/UV, Fe2+/H2O2) and chemical treatment methods using Al2(SO4)3.18H2O, FeCl3 and FeSO4 for the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and color removal from a polyester and acetate fiber dyeing effluent is undertaken. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) showed a superior performance compared to conventional chemical treatment, which maximum achievable color and COD removal for the textile effluent used in this study was 50% and 60%, respectively. Although O3/H2O2/UV combination among other AOPs methods studied in this paper was found to give the best result (99% removal for COD and 96% removal for color), use of Fe2+/H2O2 seems to show a satisfactory COD and color removal performance and to be economically more viable choice for the acetate and polyester fiber dyeing effluent on the basis of 90% removal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.046

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the present stage of development of AOPs, sole application of AOP or combinations among AOPs themselves are unlikely to yield satisfactory effluent with reasonable cost.

    “At the present stage of development of AOPs, sole application of AOP or even combinations among AOPs themselves are unlikely to yield satisfactory effluent with reasonable cost.12”

    From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [12]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Benitez, 1997, Simultaneous photodegradation and ozonation plus UV radiation of phenolic acids––major pollutants in agro-industrial wastewaters, J. Chem. Tech. Biotech., 253, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199711)70:3<253::AID-JCTB770>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  2. Bolton, 1995, Figures of merit for the technical development and application of advanced oxidation processes, J. Adv. Oxidat. Technol., 1
  3. Carey, J.H., 1990. An introduction to advanced oxidation processes (AOP) for destruction of organics in wastewater. In: A Symposium on Advanced Oxidation Process for Contaminated Water and Air. Proceedings, 4–5 June, Toronto, Canada
  4. Chung, 1978, Reduction of azo dyes by intestinal anaerobes, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 35, 558, 10.1128/AEM.35.3.558-562.1978 · DOI
  5. Clarke, 1982, High purity water using H2O2 and UV radiation, Effluent Water Treat. J., 23, 335
  6. Galindo, 2001, Photochemical and photocatalytic degradation of an indigolid dye: a case study of acid blue 74 (AB74), J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 141, 47, 10.1016/S1010-6030(01)00435-X · DOI
  7. Glaze, 1989, Advanced oxidation processes. Description of a kinetic model for the oxidation of hazardous materials in aqueous media with ozone and hydrogen peroxide in a semibatch reactor, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28, 1573, 10.1021/ie00095a001 · DOI
  8. Hao, 2000, Decolorization of wastewater, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 449, 10.1080/10643380091184237 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kang, 1997, Coagulation of textile secondary effluent with Fenton’s reagent, Water Sci. Technol., 36, 215, 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00707-5 · DOI
  10. Ledakowicz, 1999, Optimisation of oxidant dose for combined chemical and biological treatment of textile wastewater, Water Res., 33, 2511, 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00494-1 · DOI
  11. Legrini, 1983, Photochemical processes for water treatment, Chem. Rev., 93, 671, 10.1021/cr00018a003 · DOI
  12. Lin, 1994, Continuous treatment of textile wastewater by ozonation and coagulation, J. Environ. Eng., 120, 437, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1994)120:2(437) · DOI
  13. Little, L.W., Lamb, J.C., Chillingworth, M.A., Durkin, W.B., 1974. Acute toxicity of selected commercial dyes to the fathead minnow and evaluation of biological treatment for reduction of toxicity. In: Proc. 29th Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue University, Lafayette, IN, USA, pp. 524–534
  14. Marechal, 1997, Decolorization of chlorotriazine reactive azo dyes with H2O2/UV, Dyes Pigments, 33, 281, 10.1016/S0143-7208(96)00057-5 · DOI
  15. McMullan, 2001, Microbial decolourisation and degradation of textile dyes, Appl. Microbiol. Technol., 56, 81, 10.1007/s002530000587 · DOI
  16. McKay, 1979, Waste colour removal from textile effluents, J. Am. Dyes. Rep., 68, 29
  17. Mishra, 1993, A Critical review of the treatments for decolourization of textile effluent, Colourage, 40, 35
  18. Nigam, 2000, Physical removal of textile dyes and solid state fermentation of dye-adsorbed agricultural residues, Bioresour. Technol., 72, 219, 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00123-6 · DOI
  19. Oliver, 2000, Decolorization of wastewater, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 499
  20. Olthof, 1976, Coagulation of textile wastewater, Text. Chem. Color., 18
  21. Pagga, 1986, The degradation of dyestuffs part II: behaviour of dyestuffs in aerobic biodegradation tests, Chemosphere, 15, 479, 10.1016/0045-6535(86)90542-4 · DOI
  22. Raghavacharya, 1997, Colour removal from industrial effluents––a comparative review of available technologies, Chem. Eng. World., 32, 53
  23. Robinson, 2001, Remediation of dyes in textile effluents; a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative, Bioresour. Technol., 77, 247, 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00080-8 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Shu, 1995, Degradation of commercial azo dyes in water using ozonation and UV enhanced ozonation process, Chemosphere, 31, 3813, 10.1016/0045-6535(95)00255-7 · DOI
  25. Solozhenko, 1995, Decolourization of azodye solutions by Fenton’s oxidation, Water Res., 29, 2206, 10.1016/0043-1354(95)00042-J · DOI
  26. Walling, 1975, Fenton’s reagent revisited, Acc. Chem. Res., 8, 125, 10.1021/ar50088a003 · DOI
  27. Weber, 1987, Kinetic studies of reduction of aromatic azo compounds in anaerobic sediment/water systems, Environ. Toxicol. Technol., 6, 911, 10.1002/etc.5620061202 · DOI
  28. Wilmott, 1998, The Biotechnology approach to colour removal from textile effluent, JSDC, 114, 38, 10.1111/j.1478-4408.1998.tb01943.x · DOI
  29. Yang, 1998, Decolorization of dyes using UV/H2O2 photochemical oxidation, Textile Chemist Colorist, 30, 27

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Azbar, N., Yonar, T., & Kestioglu, K.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
35-43
ISSN
0045-6535
DOI
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.046
Cited by
446
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review