Cited by 312Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants

8-2 Fluorotelomer alcohol aerobic soil biodegradation: Pathways, metabolites, and metabolite yields

Wang, Ning, Szostek, Bogdan, Buck, Robert C., Folsom, Patrick W., Sulecki, Lisa M., Gannon, John T.·2009·Chemosphere

Abstract

The biodegradation pathways and metabolite yields of [3-(14)C] 8-2 fluorotelomer alcohol [8-2 FTOH, F(CF(2))(7)(14)CF(2)CH(2)CH(2)OH) in aerobic soils were investigated. Studies were conducted under closed (static) and continuous headspace air flow to assess differences in degradation rate and metabolite concentrations in soil and headspace. Aerobic degradation pathways in soils were in general similar to those in aerobic sludge and bacterial culture. (14)C mass balance was achieved in soils incubated for up to 7 months. Up to 35% (14)C dosed was irreversibly bound to soils and was only recoverable by soil combustion. The average PFOA yield was approximately 25%. Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA) yield reached approximately 4%. (14)CO(2) yield was 6.8% under continuous air flow for 33 days. Three metabolites not previously identified in environmental samples were detected: 3-OH-7-3 acid [F(CF(2))(7)CHOHCH(2)COOH], 7-2 FT ketone [F(CF(2))(7)COCH(3)] and 2H-PFOA [F(CF(2))(6)CFHCOOH]. No perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) was observed. The formation of 2H-PFOA, PFHxA, and (14)CO(2) shows that multiple -CF(2)- groups were removed from 8-2 FTOH. 7-3 Acid [F(CF(2))(7)CH(2)CH(2)COOH] reached a yield of 11% at day 7 and did not change thereafter. 7-3 Acid was incubated in aerobic soil and did not degrade to PFOA. 7-2 sFTOH [F(CF(2))(7)CH(OH)CH(3)], a transient metabolite, was incubated and degraded principally to PFOA. 7-3 Acid may be a unique metabolite from 8-2 FTOH biodegradation. The terminal ratio of PFOA to 7-3 acid ranged between 1.8-2.5 in soils and 0.6-3.2 in activated sludge, sediment, and mixed bacterial culture. This ratio may be useful in evaluating environmental samples to distinguish the potential contribution of 8-2 FTOH biodegradation to PFOA observed versus PFOA originating from other sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.01.033

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 312

Authors
Wang, N., Szostek, B., Buck, R. C., Folsom, P. W., Sulecki, L. M., & Gannon, J. T.
Affiliations
DuPont (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Ning
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
75
Issue
8
Pages
1089-1096
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998451227
Cited by
312
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Keywords
perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorohexanoic acid, degradation pathways, carbon mass balance
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Fluorocarbons, Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated, Kinetics, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Soil Pollutants, Time Factors, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review