The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), endocrine disrupting contaminants (EDCs), metabolites and illicit drugs in a WWTW and environmental waters
Open accessAbstract
A large number of emerging contaminants (ECs) are known to persist in surface waters, and create pressure on wastewater treatment works (WWTW) for their effective removal. Although a large database for the levels of these pollutants in water systems exist globally, there is still a lack in the correlation of the levels of these pollutants with possible long-term adverse health effects in wildlife and humans, such as endocrine disruption. The current study detected a total of 55 ECs in WWTW influent surface water, 41 ECs in effluent, and 40 ECs in environmental waters located upstream and downstream of the plant. A list of ECs persisted through the WWTW process, with 28% of all detected ECs removed by less than 50%, and 18% of all ECs were removed by less than 25%. Negative mass balances of some pharmaceuticals and metabolites were observed within the WWTW, suggesting possible back-transformation of ECs during wastewater treatment. Three parental illicit drug compounds were detected within the influent of the WWTW, with concentrations ranging between 27.6 and 147.0 ng L −1 for cocaine, 35.6–120.6 ng L −1 for mephedrone, and 270.9–450.2 ng L −1 for methamphetamine. The related environmental risks are also discussed for some ECs, with particular reference to their ability to disrupt endocrine systems. The current study propose the potential of the pharmaceuticals carbamazepine, naproxen, diclofenac and ibuprofen to be regarded as priority ECs for environmental monitoring due to their regular detection and persistence in environmental waters and their possible contribution towards adverse health effects in humans and wildlife.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanocatalysts and other nanomaterials for water remediation from organic pollutants
Lu, F., & Astruc, D. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213180 · Cited by 682
Fekadu, S., Alemayehu, E., Dewil, R., & Van der Bruggen, B. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.072 · Cited by 499
Sathishkumar, P., Meena, R. A. A., Palanisami, T., Ashokkumar, V., Palvannan, T., & Gu, F. L. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134057 · Cited by 445
Engineered biochar – A sustainable solution for the removal of antibiotics from water
Krasucka, P., Pan, B., Sik Ok, Y., Mohan, D., Sarkar, B., & Oleszczuk, P. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126926 · Cited by 401
Brandts, I., Teles, M., Gonçalves, A. P., Barreto, A., Franco-Martinez, L., Tvarijonaviciute, A., Martins, M. A., Soares, A. M. V. M., Tort, L., & Oliveira, M. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.257 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Archer, E., Petrie, B., Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., & Wolfaardt, G. M.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 174
- Pages
- 437-446
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2580809651
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), endocrine disrupting contaminants (EDCs), metabolites and illicit drugs in a WWTW and environmental waters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.101
- The paper
- Archer, E., Petrie, B., Kasprzyk-Hordern, B., & Wolfaardt, G. M. (2017). The fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), endocrine disrupting contaminants (EDCs), metabolites and illicit drugs in a WWTW and environmental waters. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.