The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibiotic resistance in urban and hospital wastewaters and their impact on a receiving freshwater ecosystem
Open accessAbstract
The main objective of this study was to investigate the antibiotic resistance (AR) levels in wastewater (WW) and the impact on the receiving river. Samples were collected once per season over one year in the WW of a hospital, in the raw and treated WW of two wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), as well as upstream and downstream from the release of WWTPs effluents into the Zenne River (Belgium). Culture-dependent methods were used to quantify Escherichia coli and heterotrophic bacteria resistant to amoxicillin, sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid and tetracycline. Six antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were quantified in both particle-attached (PAB) and free-living (FLB) bacteria. Our results showed that WWTPs efficiently removed antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) regardless of its AR profile. The ARGs levels were the highest in the hospital WW and were significantly reduced in both WWTPs. However, ARB and ARGs abundances significantly increased into the Zenne River downstream from the WWTPs outfalls. The variation in the relative abundance of ARGs through WW treatment differed depending on the WWTP, fraction, and gene considered. The sul1 and sul2 genes in PAB fraction showed significantly higher relative abundances in the effluent compared to the influent of both WWTPs. This study demonstrated that WWTPs could be hotspots for AR spread with significant impacts on receiving freshwater ecosystems. This was the first comprehensive study investigating at the same time antibiotics occurrence, fecal bacteria indicators, heterotrophic bacterial communities, and ARGs (distinguishing PAB and FLB) to assess AR levels in WW and impacts on the receiving river.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review
Balouiri, M., Sadiki, M., & Ibnsouda, S. K. (2016) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005 · Cited by 8,044
Rizzo, L., Manaia, C., Merlin, C., Schwartz, T., Dagot, C., Ploy, M. C., Michael, I., & Fatta-Kassinos, D. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.032 · Cited by 2,493
Cited by
Wang, J., Chu, L., Wojnárovits, L., & Takács, E. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140997 · Cited by 895
Mutuku, C., Gazdag, Z., & Melegh, S. (2022) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-022-03334-0 · Cited by 280
Burch, T. R., Newton, R. J., Kimbell, L. K., LaMartina, E. L., O'Malley, K., Thomson, S. M., Marshall, C. W., & McNamara, P. J. (2022) · Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology · doi:10.1039/d2ew00087c · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenzo, P., Adriana, A., Jessica, S., Carles, B., Marinella, F., Marta, L., Luis, B. J., & Pierre, S.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 206
- Pages
- 70-82
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800721443
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibiotic resistance in urban and hospital wastewaters and their impact on a receiving freshwater ecosystem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.163
- The paper
- Lorenzo, P., Adriana, A., Jessica, S., Carles, B., Marinella, F., Marta, L., Luis, B. J., & Pierre, S. (2018). Antibiotic resistance in urban and hospital wastewaters and their impact on a receiving freshwater ecosystem. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.