Cited by 26Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaAntibiotic Use and Resistance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeting current and future threats: recent methodological trends in environmental antimicrobial resistance research and their relationships to risk assessment

Open access
Burch, Tucker R., Newton, Ryan J., Kimbell, Lee K., LaMartina, Emily Lou, O'Malley, Kassidy, Thomson, San Marie, Marshall, Christopher W., McNamara, Patrick J.·2022·Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology

Abstract

Recent research on antimicrobial resistance in the environment has emphasized targeted methods. Increased use of non-targeted methods is needed to determine how frequently novel resistance genes arise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d2ew00087c

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Urban stormwater runoff is a source of selective pressures and ARGs into the environment.

    “Urban stormwater runoff is also a source of selective pressures and ARGs into the environment; however, storm­ water has not been as comprehensively researched as WWTPs and the agricultural sector in regard to ARGs (Burch et al., 2022).”

    From Review of emerging contaminants in green stormwater infrastructure: antibiotic resistance genes, microplastics, tire wear particles, PFAS, and temperature (2024) · cites this paper as Burch et al., 2022

    Section 4.4 says stormwater can mix with sewage, metals, and other pollutants, creating potential for new ARGs or antibiotic-resistant bacteria to emerge. Sections 4.1 and 4.3 describe stormwater AMR as under-studied relative to wastewater and livestock manure. The paper does not establish the stronger claim that urban runoff definitively carries selective pressures and ARGs into the environment. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Stormwater has not been as comprehensively researched as WWTPs and the agricultural sector in regard to ARGs.

    “Urban stormwater runoff is also a source of selective pressures and ARGs into the environment; however, storm­ water has not been as comprehensively researched as WWTPs and the agricultural sector in regard to ARGs (Burch et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 151

  1. Hu, 2021, Sci. Total Environ., 800, 149650, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149650 · DOI
  2. Clardy, 2009, Curr. Biol., 19, R437, 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chait, 2011, Nat. Chem. Biol., 8, 2, 10.1038/nchembio.745 · DOI
  4. Han, 2016, Environ. Pollut., 211, 48, 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.033 · DOI
  5. Yang, 2019, Environ. Int., 123, 79, 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.061 · DOI
  6. Pruden, 2006, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 7445, 10.1021/es060413l · DOI
  7. Berendonk, 2015, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 13, 310, 10.1038/nrmicro3439 · DOI
  8. Pruden, 2021, Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 64, 91, 10.1016/j.mib.2021.09.013 · DOI
  9. Ashbolt, 2013, Environ. Health Perspect., 121, 993, 10.1289/ehp.1206316 · DOI
  10. Martínez, 2014, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 13, 116, 10.1038/nrmicro3399 · DOI
  11. Manaia, 2017, Trends Microbiol., 25, 173, 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.014 · DOI
  12. Zhang, 2021, Nat. Commun., 12, 1, 10.1038/s41467-020-20314-w · DOI · Paper page
  13. Finley, 2013, Clin. Infect. Dis., 57, 704, 10.1093/cid/cit355 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bengtsson-Palme, 2015, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 13, 396, 10.1038/nrmicro3399-c1 · DOI
  15. Han, 2020, Water Res., 183, 116088, 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116088 · DOI
  16. Gao, 2020, Environ. Int., 136, 105484, 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105484 · DOI
  17. Li, 2018, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25, 11565, 10.1007/s11356-018-1339-1 · DOI
  18. Tong, 2020, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 27, 31995, 10.1007/s11356-020-09487-5 · DOI
  19. Harb, 2019, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 6, 578, 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00521 · DOI
  20. Wu, 2020, Sci. Total Environ., 715, 136975, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136975 · DOI
  21. Mi, 2019, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 366, fnz067, 10.1093/femsle/fnz067 · DOI
  22. Huang, 2019, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 138, 114, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.01.009 · DOI
  23. Szekeres, 2018, Environ. Pollut., 236, 734, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.107 · DOI
  24. Liu, 2019, Environ. Pollut., 246, 163, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.005 · DOI
  25. Stange, 2020, Sci. Total Environ., 742, 140529, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140529 · DOI
  26. Elkayam, 2018, J. Environ. Eng., 144, 05017011, 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001334 · DOI
  27. Adelowo, 2018, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25, 2744, 10.1007/s11356-017-0686-7 · DOI
  28. Shi, 2019, mSystems, 4, 296
  29. Zou, 2020, Environ. Pollut., 260, 114041, 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114041 · DOI
  30. Hubbard, 2020, Sci. Total Environ., 735, 139459, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139459 · DOI
  31. Matlou, 2019, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 26, 15105, 10.1007/s11356-019-04836-5 · DOI
  32. Gekenidis, 2018, PLoS One, 13, e0207857, 10.1371/journal.pone.0207857 · DOI
  33. Zhang, 2019, Groundwater, 57, 807, 10.1111/gwat.12924 · DOI
  34. Kothari, 2019, MBio, 10, e02899-18, 10.1128/mBio.02899-18 · DOI
  35. Zhang, 2020, J. Hazard. Mater., 386, 121895, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121895 · DOI
  36. Yuan, 2018, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 161, 251, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.049 · DOI
  37. Pu, 2019, Sci. Total Environ., 688, 262, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.081 · DOI
  38. Barrios, 2020, Sci. Total Environ., 712, 136505, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136505 · DOI
  39. Lan, 2019, J. Environ. Manage., 231, 439, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.073 · DOI
  40. Pu, 2018, J. Hazard. Mater., 344, 441, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.10.031 · DOI
  41. Guo, 2019, Bioresour. Technol., 274, 418, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.005 · DOI
  42. Ma, 2018, Chem. Eng. J., 334, 630, 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.051 · DOI
  43. Wallace, 2018, Environ. Pollut., 236, 764, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.024 · DOI
  44. Liu, 2019, Sci. Total Environ., 648, 12, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.101 · DOI
  45. Gao, 2020, Sci. Total Environ., 741, 140482, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140482 · DOI
  46. Zhang, 2019, Sci. Total Environ., 658, 152, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.175 · DOI
  47. Huang, 2019, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 85, e02878-18, 10.1128/AEM.02878-18 · DOI
  48. Li, 2020, Bioresour. Technol., 300, 122669, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122669 · DOI
  49. Zhang, 2019, Chemosphere, 229, 461, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.036 · DOI
  50. Couch, 2019, J. Environ. Qual., 48, 171, 10.2134/jeq2018.09.0331 · DOI
  51. Lopatto, 2019, PLoS One, 14, e0220770, 10.1371/journal.pone.0220770 · DOI
  52. Zhang, 2019, Sci. Total Environ., 649, 396, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.212 · DOI
  53. Chen, 2018, Environ. Pollut., 237, 977, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.009 · DOI
  54. Wu, 2020, Bioresour. Technol., 300, 122728, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122728 · DOI
  55. Su, 2018, Sci. Total Environ., 616–617, 453, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.318 · DOI
  56. Garner, 2018, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 6113, 10.1021/acs.est.7b05419 · DOI
  57. Stange, 2019, Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, 222, 541, 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.02.002 · DOI
  58. Wang, 2018, Environ. Pollut., 234, 71, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.050 · DOI
  59. Zhang, 2019, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 2141, 10.1021/acs.est.8b05907 · DOI
  60. Garner, 2019, Water Res., 151, 75, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.003 · DOI
  61. Zhang, 2020, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 188, 109837, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109837 · DOI
  62. Lu, 2018, Water, 10, 246, 10.3390/w10030246 · DOI
  63. Wan, 2019, Environ. Int., 125, 117, 10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.054 · DOI
  64. Sandberg, 2018, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 5, 20, 10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00552 · DOI
  65. Douterelo, 2018, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 4, 2080
  66. Hu, 2019, Sci. Total Environ., 669, 777, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.143 · DOI
  67. Zhang, 2019, Chem. Eng. J., 358, 589, 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.218 · DOI
  68. Hu, 2018, J. Hazard. Mater., 360, 364, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.012 · DOI
  69. Zhou, 2018, Environ. Int., 121, 1155, 10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.032 · DOI
  70. Zheng, 2018, Sci. Total Environ., 612, 1, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.072 · DOI
  71. Ma, 2019, Water Res., 152, 191, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.069 · DOI
  72. Hao, 2019, J. Hazard. Mater., 365, 340, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.004 · DOI
  73. Huang, 2019, J. Environ. Manage., 231, 494, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.051 · DOI
  74. Zhang, 2018, Environ. Pollut., 233, 132, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.084 · DOI
  75. Zhang, 2018, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 248, 10.1021/acs.est.7b04283 · DOI
  76. Liu, 2018, Water Res., 136, 131, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.036 · DOI
  77. Iakovides, 2019, Water Res., 159, 333, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.05.025 · DOI
  78. Liao, 2018, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 266, 10.1021/acs.est.7b04483 · DOI
  79. Wang, 2018, Sci. Total Environ., 621, 990, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.128 · DOI
  80. Ren, 2018, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 8666, 10.1021/acs.est.8b01888 · DOI
  81. Sabri, 2020, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 102245, 10.1016/j.jece.2018.03.004 · DOI
  82. Le, 2018, Water Res., 145, 498, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.060 · DOI
  83. Karaolia, 2018, Appl. Catal., B, 224, 810, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.020 · DOI
  84. An, 2018, Environ. Int., 117, 146, 10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.011 · DOI
  85. Moreira, 2018, Water Res., 135, 195, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.064 · DOI
  86. Ju, 2019, ISME J., 13, 346, 10.1038/s41396-018-0277-8 · DOI
  87. Zhao, 2019, Water Res., 151, 388, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.034 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Chu, 2018, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 84, e02168-17, 10.1128/AEM.02168-17 · DOI
  89. Cacace, 2019, Water Res., 162, 320, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.039 · DOI
  90. Pärnänen, 2019, Sci. Adv., 5, eaau9124, 10.1126/sciadv.aau9124 · DOI
  91. Lorenzo, 2018, Chemosphere, 206, 70, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.163 · DOI
  92. Lee, 2020, Sci. Total Environ., 723, 138033, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138033 · DOI · Paper page
  93. McConnell, 2018, J. Environ. Qual., 47, 997, 10.2134/jeq2017.12.0477 · DOI
  94. Carney, 2019, Water Res., 167, 115081, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115081 · DOI
  95. Dewi, 2020, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 86, e02939-19, 10.1128/AEM.02939-19 · DOI
  96. Ahmed, 2018, Environ. Int., 116, 308, 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.005 · DOI
  97. Sidhu, 2020, Water Res., 185, 116269, 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116269 · DOI
  98. Białasek, 2020, Chemosphere, 258, 127392, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127392 · DOI
  99. Chaudhary, 2018, mSphere, 3, e00194-18, 10.1128/mSphere.00194-18 · DOI
  100. Baral, 2018, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 9033, 10.1021/acs.est.8b01219 · DOI
  101. Sen, 2019, Front. Microbiol., 10, 1034, 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01034 · DOI
  102. Sun, 2019, J. Hazard. Mater., 365, 1, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.093 · DOI
  103. Peleg, 2008, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 21, 538, 10.1128/CMR.00058-07 · DOI
  104. Savard, 2012, Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis., 25, 371, 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283558c17 · DOI
  105. T.Aven , Y.Ben-Haim , H. B.Andersen , T.Cox , E. L.Droguett , M.Greenberg , S.Guikema , W.Kröger , O.Renn , K. M.Thompson and E.Zio , Society for risk analysis glossary , 2018
  106. C. N.Haas , J. B.Rose and C. P.Gerba , Quantitative microbial risk assessment, Quantitative microbial risk assessment , John Wiley & Sons, Inc. , Hoboken, New Jersey , 2nd edn, 2014 · DOI
  107. NRC , Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process, Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process , National Academies Press , Washington, D.C. , 1983
  108. Larsen, 2022, Nature, 602, 135, 10.1038/s41586-021-04265-w · DOI
  109. Andrade, 2020, Water Res., 170, 115360, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115360 · DOI
  110. Sanganyado, 2019, Sci. Total Environ., 669, 785, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.162 · DOI
  111. Gweon, 2019, Environ. Microbiome, 14, 1, 10.1186/s40793-019-0347-1 · DOI
  112. Davis, 2020, Nucleic Acids Res., 48, D606
  113. Alcock, 2020, Nucleic Acids Res., 48, D517, 10.1093/nar/gkz1136 · DOI
  114. Geisinger, 2019, MBio, 10, e01127-19, 10.1128/mBio.01127-19 · DOI
  115. Santos-Lopez, 2019, eLife, 8, e47612, 10.7554/eLife.47612 · DOI
  116. Garratt, 2021, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 87, 1, 10.1128/AEM.00210-21 · DOI
  117. Sanz-García, 2022, Environ. Microbiol., 24, 1279, 10.1111/1462-2920.15806 · DOI
  118. dos Santos, 2017, Microb. Ecol., 73, 479, 10.1007/s00248-016-0866-x · DOI
  119. Hadjadj, 2019, Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn., 19, 349, 10.1080/14737159.2019.1592678 · DOI
  120. Bendall, 2016, ISME J., 10, 1589, 10.1038/ismej.2015.241 · DOI
  121. Card, 2021, Evolution, 75, 1230, 10.1111/evo.14203 · DOI
  122. Hall, 2013, J. Evol. Biol., 26, 1655, 10.1111/jeb.12172 · DOI
  123. Yahara, 2021, Genome Med., 13, 1, 10.1186/s13073-021-00860-8 · DOI
  124. Suarez, 2021, Microbiol. Spectrum, 9, e00289-21, 10.1128/Spectrum.00289-21 · DOI
  125. Li, 2015, ISME J., 9, 2490, 10.1038/ismej.2015.59 · DOI
  126. Guo, 2017, Water Res., 123, 468, 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.002 · DOI
  127. Durrant, 2020, Cell Host Microbe, 27, 140, 10.1016/j.chom.2019.10.022 · DOI
  128. Gillings, 2013, Front. Microbiol., 4, 4, 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00004 · DOI
  129. Michael, 2014, Front. Public Health, 2, 145, 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00145 · DOI
  130. Baba, 2002, Lancet, 359, 1819, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08713-5 · DOI
  131. Rossi, 2014, N. Engl. J. Med., 370, 1524, 10.1056/NEJMoa1303359 · DOI · Paper page
  132. Vassallo, 2021, Antibiotics, 10, 1066, 10.3390/antibiotics10091066 · DOI
  133. Enault, 2017, ISME J., 11, 237, 10.1038/ismej.2016.90 · DOI
  134. Redondo-Salvo, 2020, Nat. Commun., 11, 1, 10.1038/s41467-020-17278-2 · DOI
  135. Garriss, 2009, PLoS Genet., 5, e1000775, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000775 · DOI
  136. Schoen, 2020, Microb. Risk Anal., 16, 100136, 10.1016/j.mran.2020.100136 · DOI
  137. Anderson, 2001, Food Control, 12, 13, 10.1016/S0956-7135(00)00014-1 · DOI
  138. Hurd, 2010, Foodborne Pathog. Dis., 7, 1305, 10.1089/fpd.2010.0550 · DOI
  139. Otto, 2014, Clin. Infect. Dis., 59, 1281, 10.1093/cid/ciu496 · DOI
  140. Cox, 2009, Risk Anal., 29, 796, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01202.x · DOI
  141. Cox, 2004, Risk Anal., 24, 271, 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00428.x · DOI
  142. Cox, 2020, Risk Anal., 40, 1244, 10.1111/risa.13466 · DOI
  143. Hurd, 2004, J. Food Prot., 67, 980, 10.4315/0362-028X-67.5.980 · DOI
  144. Hurd, 2008, Risk Anal., 28, 695, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01054.x · DOI
  145. Chandrasekaran, 2019, Sci. Rep., 9, 1, 10.1038/s41598-018-37186-2 · DOI · Paper page
  146. Gillings, 2009, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 296, 282, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01646.x · DOI
  147. Moura, 2010, Res. Microbiol., 161, 58, 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.11.004 · DOI
  148. Rizzo, 2013, Sci. Total Environ., 447, 345, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.032 · DOI · Paper page
  149. Gatica, 2016, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11825, 10.1021/acs.est.6b03188 · DOI
  150. Kathirvel, 2021, Exp. Eye Res., 212, 108764, 10.1016/j.exer.2021.108764 · DOI
  151. Jin, 2022, Environ. Sci. Technol., 10.1021/acs.est.2c01651 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Burch, T. R., Newton, R. J., Kimbell, L. K., LaMartina, E. L., O'Malley, K., Thomson, S. M., Marshall, C. W., & McNamara, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
  • Marquette University (US)
Corresponding author
McNamara, Patrick J.
Venue
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Published
2022
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
1787-1802
ISSN
  • 2053-1400 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-1419
OpenAlex
W4287964782
Cited by
26
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science Water Research & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • e-Publications@Marquette (Marquette University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2027288, 2027233, 2051336)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (5090-12630-006-00D)
  • Engineer Research and Development Center (W9132T2220001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, risk assessment, novel resistance genes, environmental microbiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review