The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An ensemble long short-term memory neural network for hourly PM2.5 concentration forecasting
Abstract
To protect public health by providing an early warning, PM2.5 concentration forecasting is an essential and effective work. In this paper, an ensemble long short-term memory neural network (E-LSTM) is proposed for hourly PM2.5 concentration forecasting. The presented model is implemented using three steps: (1) ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) is firstly utilized for multi-modal feature extraction, (2) long short-term memory approach (LSTM) is then employed for multi-modal feature learning, and (3) inverse EEMD computation is finally used for multi-modal feature estimated integration. In each modeling process, the mode information of the PM2.5 and the corresponding meteorological variables in 1-h advance are utilized as inputs to forecast the next mode information of the PM2.5 concentration. To evaluate the performance of the E-LSTM model, two datasets collected from two environmental monitoring stations in Beijing, China, are investigated. It is demonstrated that the E-LSTM model inspired by ensemble learning, which constructs multiple LSTMs in different modes, obtained better forecasting performance than that using the single LSTM and feed forward neural network in terms of mean absolute percentage error (19.604% and 16.929%), root mean square error (12.077 μg m-3 and 13.983 μg m-3), and correlation coefficient criteria (0.994 and 0.991) respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2016.2582924 · Cited by 6,955
Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study
Opitz, D., & Maclin, R. (1999) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.614 · Cited by 2,953
Rokach, L. (2010) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-009-9124-7 · Cited by 2,657
Cited by
A deep learning framework for building energy consumption forecast
Somu, N., Raman M R, G., & Ramamritham, K. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110591 · Cited by 500
A review of artificial neural network models for ambient air pollution prediction
Cabaneros, S. M., Calautit, J. K., & Hughes, B. R. (2019) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.06.014 · Cited by 459
Subramaniam, S., Raju, N., Ganesan, A., Rajavel, N., Chenniappan, M., Prakash, C., Pramanik, A., Basak, A. K., & Dixit, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14169951 · Cited by 193
Optimising Deep Learning at the Edge for Accurate Hourly Air Quality Prediction
Wardana, I. N. K., Gardner, J. W., & Fahmy, S. A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041064 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, Y., Zeng, B., Li, C., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 222
- Pages
- 286-294
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912189257
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An ensemble long short-term memory neural network for hourly PM2.5 concentration forecasting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.121
- The paper
- Bai, Y., Zeng, B., Li, C., & Zhang, J. (2019). An ensemble long short-term memory neural network for hourly PM2.5 concentration forecasting. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.121
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.