Cited by 2,657Machine Learning and Data ClassificationImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesForecasting Techniques and Applications

Ensemble-based classifiers

Open access
Rokach, Lior·2010·Artificial Intelligence Review

Abstract

The idea of ensemble methodology is to build a predictive model by integrating multiple models. It is well-known that ensemble methods can be used for improving prediction performance. Researchers from various disciplines such as statistics and AI considered the use of ensemble methodology. This paper, review existing ensemble techniques and can be served as a tutorial for practitioners who are interested in building ensemble based systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10462-009-9124-7

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The improvement in classification accuracy when using PCs from four tasks together is consistent with the underlying theorem of ensemble-based classification.

    “This is consistent with the underlying theorem of ensemble-based classification (Rokach, 2010; Klöppel et al., 2012).”
  • Classifying participants using several measurements (e.g., fMRI data from few distinct VSWM tasks), where each measurement enables better than chance classification and there is substantial independency between measurements, enabled higher classification accuracies compared to using data from each single measurement.

    “As expected based on this theorem, classifying participants by using several measurements for each participant (e.g., fMRI data from few distinct VSWM tasks), where each measurement enables a better than chance classification accuracy, and where there is a substantial degree of independency between the measurements (e.g., distinct cognitive tasks), enabled higher classification accuracies compared”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. E. Summary, "Data Leakage Worldwide: Common Risks and Mistakes Employees Make," Europe, pp. 1-8, 2008.
  2. W. L. W. Lee, S. J. Stolfo, and K. W. Mok, "A data mining framework for building intrusion detection models," IEEE Symp. Secur. Priv., vol. 00, no. c, pp. 120-132, 1999. DOI:10.1109/SECPRI.1999.766909 · DOI
  3. C. Guevara, M. Santos and J. A. Martín, "Método para la Detección de Intrusos basado en la Sinergia de Técni- cas de Inteligencia Artificial," in Proceedings of the IV Congreso Español de Informática CEDI 2013, pp. 963- 972.
  4. NSL-KDD. Disponible en: http://nsl.cs.unb.ca/NSL- KDD/
  5. J. McHugh, "Testing Intrusion detection systems: a critique of the 1998 and 1999 DARPA intrusion detection system evaluations as performed by Lin- coln Laboratory," ACM Transactions on Informa- tion and System Security, vol. 3. pp. 262-294, 2000. DOI:10.1145/382912.382923 · DOI
  6. J. R. Quinlan, "Induction of decision trees," Mach. Learn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81-106, 1986. DOI:10.1023/A:1022643204877 · DOI · Paper page
  7. J. C. Platt, "Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines," Adv. Kernel Methods Support Vector Learn., vol. 208, pp. 1-21, 1998.
  8. P. Domingos and M. Pazzani, "On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Los," Mach. Learn., vol. 29, no. 2-3, pp. 103-130, 1997.
  9. D. Pyle, Data Preparation for Data Mining, 1st ed., vol. 1. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1999. DOI:10.1023/A:1007413511361 · DOI
  10. F. Ceballos, L. E. Muñoz, and J. Moreno, "Selección de perceptrones multicapa usando aprendizaje bayesiano," Sci. Tech., no. 49, pp. 110-115, 2011.
  11. L. Rokach, "Ensemble-based classifiers," Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 33, no. 1-2, pp. 1-39, 2010. DOI:10.1007/ s10462-009-9124-7
  12. H. Liu and R. Setiono, "Feature Selection and Classifica- tion: A Probabilistic Wrapper Approach," in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, 1996, pp. 419-424.
  13. J. Alcala-Fdez, L. Sanchez, S. Garcia, M. J. del Jesus, S. Ventura, J. M. Garrell, J. Otero, C. Romero, J. Bacardit, V. M. Rivas, J. C. Fernandez, and F. Herrera, "KEEL: a software tool to assess evolutionary algorithms for data mining problems," Soft Comput., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 307- 318, 2009. Disponible: //www.keel.es/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rokach, L.
Affiliations
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Corresponding author
Rokach, Lior
Venue
Artificial Intelligence Review
Published
2009-11-19
Volume
33
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-39
ISSN
  • 0269-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7462
OpenAlex
W2155806188
Cited by
2,657
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 162 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 214 · 2022: 228 · 2021: 242 · 2020: 261 · 2019: 266 · 2018: 205 · 2017: 172 · 2016: 155 · 2015: 146 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 59
FWCI
41.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence Review (publishedVersion)
  • Inge CUC (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DSPACE System - Metalibrary (University of the Coast) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
ensemble methods, ensemble classifiers, model integration, predictive performance, classifier combination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review